Et Tu, Ivanka?

No one knows better than Ivanka Trump about the power of imagery, which I wrote about earlier this week. (She’d cropped Kimberly Guilfoyle, her brother’s fiancé, out of an Instagram photograph. She said it wasn’t deliberate. But Ivanka is not somebody who puts up Instagram posts without deliberation.)

In case you’ve forgotten (and you may have, because it feels like a lifetime ago), before she went into her father’s White House, Ivanka had a clothing line. The line had its ups and its downs, but it had one powerful asset that remained consistent: Ivanka’s messaging. This is a woman who once wrote in the introduction of a memoir, “Perception is more important than reality.”

Therefore, the fact that Ivanka did not show up at Trump’s presidential announcement just to smile and say “good luck, Dad” sent a much clearer message than the statement she released declaring she wanted to stay out of politics and parent her three young children.

In Republican consultant circles, there was a fairly startled reaction to her absence, made only more glaring when, two days later, she was photographed wakeboarding. In other words: She wasn’t absent from her father’s speech because she was doing anything especially meaningful with her time.

Read the rest at “Vicky Ward Investigates.”

What a Crop

“A picture is worth a thousand words” goes the adage.

And never was that truer than with the picture Ivanka Trump posted to commemorate her half-sister Tiffany Trump’s wedding this weekend. In the photo are five statuesque blondes who were all, other than the bride, dressed in flowing, pastel-colored or light metallic dresses. Just one thing was missing: Don Jr.’s fiancé Kimberly Guilfoyle, 53, who had been dressed in black, and who Ivanka had cropped out of the photo.

Though she later posted the photo in its entirety to her Instagram Stories with three “smiling face with hearts” emojis, Ivanka’s initial omission highlighted what my sources report as “tensions” between the former president’s eldest daughter and Guilfoyle, whose colorful dating life pre-Don Jr. is said to be one of the major causes of a long-held mistrust between the two women.

“It was well known that Ivanka was not a fan of Kim,” someone who knows both women well told me.

Read the rest at “Vicky Ward Investigates.”

“A major lesson for us is that this 2020 nonsense has got to stop.”

Like many, I found last night’s midterm results somewhat perplexing. I know that many commentators have said that regardless of who wins the Senate, the results are a rejection of Trump and an endorsement of Florida governor Ron DeSantis, but is it that simple?

I asked Trump’s first political consultant, Sam Nunberg, who worked on the Trump 2016 campaign—and who also lives in Florida—for his take. My readers will be familiar with Sam by now, and what he said was fascinating.

The most urgent message, in Sam’s view, was the GOP has got to stop talking about the 2020 election and “move on.”

The second is that, yes, DeSantis could beat Trump in Iowa—but not if Trump gets indicted…

You can listen here or read below for a transcript of our conversation at “Vicky Ward Investigates.”

Here’s Why Trump Crony Tom Barrack Was Acquitted of Spying for the UAE

After seven weeks at trial, longtime Trump ally Tom Barrack was acquitted today of all charges against him regarding the allegation he acted as an unregistered foreign lobbyist for the United Arab Emirates.

Why?

There are three main reasons I believe that the jury acquitted Barrack and his young associate Matthew Grimes.

Read them all at “Vicky Ward Investigates.” 

All Roads Lead to Putin

This afternoon, the trial of Trump crony Tom Barrack drew to a dramatic close. You could hear a pin drop as prosecutor Sam Nitze—who, as I’ve written about before, has a flair for the dramatic—effectively scaled back his tone and his strident demeanor to tell the jury sotto voce that essentially it doesn’t matter how much they admire 75-year-old tycoon Barrack or agree with his opinions on the Middle East or how much sympathy they feel for 29-year-old Matthew Grimes for making the mistake of choosing the wrong mentor in Barrack. The law is the law, Nitze said—and Barrack and Grimes went “way, way over a line” by working as unregistered foreign agents for the UAE, according to the evidence, which is composed, at least partially, of dozens of damning text messages and emails.

Nitze also said repeatedly that Barrack lied in the courtroom, leaving me to wonder if that ultimately could leave the defendant open for additional perjury charges.

There was one moment that I found especially fascinating: when Nitze talked of how complicated it is when private citizens get muddled up in national security issues. He pointed out that yes, the UAE is a U.S. ally, but look at the recent photograph showing UAE President MBZ with Russian President Vladimir Putin. In other words: Allegiances shift, which is why we have protocols and a State Department. (Finally, I understood why the government had Rex Tillerson testify at this trial!)

At the mention of MBZ with Putin, Barrack put his head in his hands.

Read the rest at “Vicky Ward Investigates.”

Davos in the Desert Impacts a Trump Crony in Court

There’s heavy irony in the fact that the trial of Trump crony billionaire businessman Tom Barrack—focused on allegations that he and a young aide acted as foreign agents for the United Arab Emirates, a country that has generally been considered a US ally for decades—continues apace while over in Saudi Arabia—a kingdom that is 500 miles from the UAE and is their closest ally—the Saudis are hosting Wall Street’s brightest and best at the annual conference nicknamed “Davos in the Desert.”

After the jury left Monday’s proceedings, there was chat among the lawyers about Stephen Schwarzman, the chairman of the private equity giant Blackstone. Barrack’s defense team wanted to show a video of Schwarzman essentially saying the same flattering things about the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman that Barrack has. (This flattery is along the lines of his reforms and efforts to transition Saudi Arabia away from an oil-based economy.)

The government objected. The prosecution, in particular Sam Nitze, has repeatedly made it clear—especially during his cross-examination of Princeton Professor of Near Eastern Studies Bernard Haykel—that they will not tolerate images of either MBS or his mentor MBZ, the leader of the UAE, being depicted as some kind of fuzzy, Teva-wearing philanthropists without offering an alternative view of their autocratic regimes.

If the judge allowed a video of Schwarzman talking up MBS to be played, Nitze said he’d want a video of somebody else saying something less flattering: “Just like they have a video clip, we’ll look for other video clips. Jamal Khashoggi might be a name that surfaces again in terms of people saying different things than Mr. Barrack.”

(In the end, the judge did not allow the video into testimony, not wanting to go down a rabbit hole.)

But the conversation in the courtroom could not be happening at a thornier, more fragile moment in relations between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia—one that reflects on a vast international stage exactly the political battle going on inside the Barrack trial, even though the UAE and not Saudi Arabia is the country that Barrack is accused of spying for. Unfairly perhaps for the UAE, they’ve become almost indistinguishable.

Read the rest at “Vicky Ward Investigates.”

The Barrack Trial: Trump Chimes In & A Young Pawn is Sacrificed

Late Sunday, the night before Trump crony Tom Barrack, who is accused of acting as a foreign agent for the UAE between 2016 and 2018, was set to take the stand in his own trial, Trump himself sounded off about it on Truth Social.

It was the first time Trump had commented on the trial since it began six weeks ago.

I had been wondering when we’d hear from the former president, especially given that, at this point, two Trump cabinet secretaries have testified: former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and former Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin. One could hardly imagine that Trump wanted to be left out of that party. And sure enough, he wasn’t. But it isn’t clear that what he said was welcomed by the chief defendant.

To read my latest coverage of the trial, see “Vicky Ward Investigates.”

 

Could the Barrack Trial Be in Part to Blame for the Cut in Saudi Oil Production? It Certainly isn’t Helping.

Yesterday, something happened very far away from the trial of Tom Barrack that is completely related to it.

MBZ, the ruler of Abu Dhabi, met with Vladimir Putin. MBZ has made no secret of the fact that he’s livid that this trial is going on—because it makes the Emiratis look as if they are in fact on trial, too. As for the Emiratis’ closest allies, the Saudis? (MBS, the Saudi crown prince, has popped up quite a bit in the trial in a not-especially-flattering light.) MBS has also turned to Putin and essentially given the finger to the Biden administration by raising the price of oil right ahead of the midterms.

Is the Barrack trial worth all this?

Read all about it at “Vicky Ward Investigates.”

What Tillerson Didn’t Say—And Why It Matters

I received a lot of puzzled messages about Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s testimony last week in the trial of Trump crony Tom Barrack, who has been accused of acting as an undisclosed agent for the Gulf state of the United Arab Emirates.

What was the point of Tillerson’s testimony? many people asked. How did it help the government’s argument that Barrack was an unregistered agent for the UAE? In fact, many people pointed out that it seemed possibly to hurt the government’s case.

I get into all of that at “Vicky Ward Investigates.”

Rex Tillerson Testifies

As I said last week, the Tom Barrack trial could shed light on what was possibly the most corrupt, self-dealing piece of the Trump presidency’s foreign policy in the Middle East—that is, the administration’s response to the 2017 blockade of Qatar. The trial’s look into the blockade involves everyone from former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to Jared Kushner (whose name is on the witness list for the government, and whose testimony, in my opinion, the defense would be crazy not to commandeer).

Tillerson was brought in yesterday as a government witness and was asked about Barrack (whom he could barely remember) and also, thankfully, about Kushner (whom he definitely did remember).

For the scoop on Tillerson’s testimony and information about everything going on in the Barrack trial, see “Vicky Ward Investigates.”