Hot Women and Pole-Dancing: Ingenuity in a Downturn

The Russian businessman I was having a drink with lived in London. “I prefer London to New York right now; in London not everyone talks about their depleted bank balance; in New York everyone does,” he said. I agreed. But then a friend took me for a late dinner at a restaurant I’d never heard of, Charles in the West Village.

I expected the usual: a near empty restaurant and, given the hour – 10.30pm – to see most of the clientele leaving, not arriving. So I was shocked to see an unbelievably handsome guy in his twenties open the door. Behind him was a packed space fizzing with energy, sexuality and fun. This was the New York I used to know but which these days feels like a forgotten dream.

The room was bursting. There was not a seat left at the bar, though the waiter was quick to serve the drinks. Beautiful young women spilled out of revealing, barely-there tops while their dates consumed vodka like it was going out of fashion.

The secret to the place’s success, I was told, was that the six young founders all had “day jobs” but at night put their energy into running the place like old fashioned maître d’s. They took turns seating people, opening the door, making guests welcome. For eight months the place has been heaving – which means their ingenuity has paid off.

They’re not the only ones. One former Morgan Stanley employee, having been laid off, is now reportedly making $160,000 as a pole dancer. Intriguingly, she says she finds her new working environment more comfortable than her old one (Morgan Stanley later said she’d only been a temp). Still, I must say I did stop and wonder for a second whether I should take pole-dancing lessons. I even have a French friend who could teach me.

Such stories of New York’s inventiveness are inspiring. I’m reminded of a man I spoke to over the summer. He had been laid off from work and marched up and down Park Avenue wearing a billboard that advertised he was for hire. His tactics paid off and he is now employed.

So I say to my Russian friend: come back to New York! It isn’t the one-dimensional place we thought. The Big Apple may be down – but it is most certainly not out.

This article was originally published by the London Evening Standard

The Big Apple is learning to live again

The Russian businessman I was having a drink with lived in London. “I prefer London to New York right now; in London not everyone talks about their depleted bank balance; in New York everyone does,” he said. I agreed. But then a friend took me for a late dinner at a restaurant I’d never heard of, Charles in the West Village.

I expected the usual: a near empty restaurant and, given the hour – 10.30pm – to see most of the clientele leaving, not arriving. So I was shocked to see an unbelievably handsome guy in his twenties open the door. Behind him was a packed space fizzing with energy, sexuality and fun. This was the New York I used to know but which these days feels like a forgotten dream.

The room was bursting. There was not a seat left at the bar, though the waiter was quick to serve the drinks. Beautiful young women spilled out of revealing, barely-there tops while their dates consumed vodka like it was going out of fashion.

The secret to the place’s success, I was told, was that the six young founders all had “day jobs” but at night put their energy into running the place like old fashioned maître d’s. They took turns seating people, opening the door, making guests welcome. For eight months the place has been heaving – which means their ingenuity has paid off.

They’re not the only ones. One former Morgan Stanley employee, having been laid off, is now reportedly making $160,000 as a pole dancer. Intriguingly, she says she finds her new working environment more comfortable than her old one (Morgan Stanley later said she’d only been a temp). Still, I must say I did stop and wonder for a second whether I should take pole-dancing lessons. I even have a French friend who could teach me.

Such stories of New York’s inventiveness are inspiring. I’m reminded of a man I spoke to over the summer. He had been laid off from work and marched up and down Park Avenue wearing a billboard that advertised he was for hire. His tactics paid off and he is now employed.

So I say to my Russian friend: come back to New York! It isn’t the one-dimensional place we thought. The Big Apple may be down – but it is most certainly not out. V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook

Of Course Michelle Cannot Go Sleeveless To Have Tea With The Queen!

Anyone who thinks Michelle Obama should use tea with the Queen as an experimental fashion platform is sadly deluded. I cannot believe some of the suggestions I am reading on this site.

Bare shoulders at Buckingham Palace during the day would be seen as a tremendous insult to our monarch.

Do Americans not realize that in Britain, unlike America,  to wear a wedding dress in church that does not cover one’s shoulders is considered absolutely disrespectful? It was the first thing I was told when I had my wedding gown designed in London fifteen years ago. Sleeves are a must.

Imagine, then, what the Queen – who is never sleeveless on formal occasions –  would think of Michelle Obama showing up in bare-armed sheath by some clueless modern designer, when the Queen’s day uniform – as we know – is sleeves, hat, gloves – and no matter how hot the weather, tights.

The Royal family is always told that they too should wear hats, sleeves and gloves to match the formal style when paying the Royal matriarch a visit – which means, that strictly speaking, so should America’s First Lady, out of respect.

Anyone British person knows that when you are invited to Buckingham Palace, you behave – and dress – in the way Buckingham Palace suggests – not as if you were getting ready to sashay down a Fashion Week runway.

Of course it’s possible to make the Royal formal style look glamorous. No one did it better than the late Princess of Wales –  but she always dressed “correctly”.

Anyone who attends Royal Ascot or Royal Regatta at Henley during London’s so-called season knows that if you try to put fashion ahead of protocol – you will be stared at and probably kicked out.

For Henley skirts must cover the knee (I once had to stop the car en route  and buy a new dress since I realized the one I had on was just a fraction too short) and at Ascot hats must cover the top of the head. Sleeves are always required.

A friend who spent the week at Windsor Castle  during Royal Ascot one week had to get into long evening wear for dinner every single night.

So for all those shrieking about who will look the most fashionable during the G20 summit, may I suggest you dampen the nonsensical hurly-burly of  wondering who will reign in the fashion stakes. The answer is neither Sarah Brown nor Michelle Obama, nor even Carla Bruni-Sarkozy but the women who has already set the bar – for over fifty years: Her Majesty, the Queen. V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook

Sex appeal takes years to master

Details magazine has dictated that the sexiest woman on the planet is not Scarlett Johansson, or Gisele Bundchen, but Jennifer Aniston — who is 40.

Meanwhile, People magazine puts Italian actress Valerie Bertinelli, 48, in a bikini on its cover. Cindy Crawford, 43, is covered in soap suds in Allure.

There’s a celebration going on among all of us over 35. Our dirty little secret is finally out: it’s way hotter to be older and wiser than taut, 20 and clueless.

Obviously older women have been greatly advantaged by the cosmetic aids that, for example, make Demi Moore at 46 look 26. But the sexual power of age is not exclusively entwined with Botox and Restylane.

A young model at a dinner last week was theoretically the most beautiful woman in the room — but her appeal was greatly diminished by her overt insecurity about having never done anything with her life other than “model”.

She kept interrupting people, desperate to show she had a brain. The belle of the party was a woman in her late thirties who was eight months pregnant. She focused complete attention on whomever she talked to. All the men left besotted.

Their comments reminded me of a recent lunch I had with a businessman 20 years my senior. Somehow the conversation detoured from market volatility into a seminar on why older women often are more appealing than youngsters.

He said that first of all, women can be divided into racehorses and donkeys when it comes to sex, and younger women should not be fooled into thinking they are naturally better.

Second, every man likes an intelligent woman — but not a woman who feels she has to wear her brain like a garment for show. Third, men want women to make them feel masculine and important.

Young women sometimes think this is demeaning; an older woman knows it’s just how the male/female dynamic works. And lastly, a man can smell a self-involved woman a mile off; young women are often self-involved.

So now we know why 40 is sexy and 20 is well, just 20. Personally, I look back at my twenties and think how very little I knew about anything, let alone men. But I’m very glad I only got told about racehorses and donkeys recently. If I’d heard that at 20 I might never have left the starting gate. V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook

New York in Shock While LA Rocks!

W hile New Yorkers suffered minor heart attacks on Friday, as banking stocks plunged to levels not seen since 1997 around 2pm – before turning around and climbing back up, LA, so friends told me, was basking in sunlight – and its own glory.

In fact even as he watched Bank of America’s share-price nosedive on TV, one studio head blithely told me, Hollywood doesn’t want to know about the recession, the market fluctuations and wars in the Middle East: “No one wants to go to the movies to be reminded of anything like that. They want comedy, they want escapism.” Scriptwriters, take note.

Despite the reported decline in DVD sales affecting the major media companies’ bottom lines, the movie industry, unlike the banking industry, is actually booming. Theater attendance figures are up. (Just not for the mostly bleak films that have been nominated for Oscars).

So therefore don’t expect Hollywood tomorrow, to reflect the mood on the East Coast. Or across the rest of America. It won’t. Yes, some of the parties are a bit scaled back and ABC’s broadcast will have some weak advertising figures. But, for the most part, Hollywood intends on producing the glitziest Oscar telecast in years. (Spoiler alert: there will be up to four celebrity winners presenting the big awards – yes four!) And host Hugh Jackman intends to sing and dance his way through a show that reminds us of the illusion that Hollywood is really all about.

And in case teenagers are already yawning they can’t be bothered to stay up to see whether some overweight eccentric-dog-loving actor named Mickey Rourke wins, well here’s some news for them: they should stay up for presenter…Rob Pattinson. Yes, Twilight’s pale Rob Pattinson – a person largely unknown to all those viewers who know who Mickey Rourke is. In other words ABC hopes to cover a very broad demographic.

And all the self-congratulation we expect of tomorrow, isn’t necessarily out of place.

Yes, the decline in DVD sales will hurt studios in the short term, but Michael Burns, chief of Lions Gate says that in the long run, their decline will be a boon. “Shipping and packaging is expensive” he says. “How much more cost-efficient to be able to get people to buy content simply by pushing a button.”

For the next year or so Hollywood will face the same fiscal restraints as the rest of us. Fewer movies will get made. And those that get made will be carefully selected and priced – which actually benefit all of us.

Gone are the days when anyone thinks it’s a good idea to let Jerry “Blockbuster” Bruckheimer anywhere near a creampuff of a film called “Confessions of a Shopaholic” made for an astronomical $80 million – when the similarly-frothy but infinitely superior “Devil Wears Prada” was made for only $35 million. Mistakes like that will cost jobs.

So too, egomaniacal actors who want to be paid upfront and refuse to take a percentage of the film’s profits as payment may find themselves “resting”. And studios need to brace for a summer which will see reduced returns overseas on account of the dollar’s strength compared to other currency weaknesses.

But the line-ups ahead are very promising. Warner Brothers is bringing us “The Watchmen,” “Harry Potter” and “Terminator.” Dreamworks has “GI Joe” and “Transformers.”

So, Sunday night LA is prepared to party like there’s nothing wrong with the world. And that’s because, over there, relatively speaking, there isn’t. V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook

If We ‘Kill the Rich’, Don’t We Kill the Dream?

My neighbor at dinner, a hedge-fund manager originally from Texas, was emphatic.

“If your only identity is in your job or your money then there is no point living in New York any more,” he said. “Anyone who thinks like that will leave.”

He had a point. This town seems to have become unhinged by the populist rage against Wall Street and the rich. President Obama has said openly of the AIG bonuses: “I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry. I’m angry.” Meanwhile, a livid Congress has demanded a 90 per cent tax on bonuses.

This leaves many New Yorkers feeling dislocated, unsure of themselves. This town is the national epicenter of ostentation and consumerism. Now those qualities are considered tasteless. Wealth has become a dirty word.

Consider the divorce trial between Marie Douglas-David and George David, the head of United Technologies, now on the front pages of the tabloids. She is battling to raise her settlement from $37 million to $100 million — and says $37 million will only last her 15 years.

While she’s not the only woman to squabble over her divorce settlement, she is the first to do so in times when the mantra from Washington seems to be “kill the rich”.

Marie Douglas David attracts ire because she precisely fits the stereotype of a rich New York dilettante: she appears spoiled, superficial, disloyal and keen to make a buck off someone else’s back.

The problem, of course, is that not all the rich are like this, just as not everyone at AIG deserves no bonus. I know someone who left a top bank for a post at the insurance giant last year, taking a pay cut and no bonus. Now he has received death threats and requires 24-hour security.

So it is we New Yorkers who are caught in today’s cultural crossfire. In my orbit last week there was yelling at the television screen from friends who believe Congress is trying to strangle the American dream of meritocracy.

I think the President will eventually find a middle road through this mess — but it’s hard to think clearly when passions run this high. And it’s also hard to keep one’s bearings living in the city that stands for everything this country currently holds in deep contempt. V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook

The Show Must Go On At Fashion Week, Despite the Economy

New York Fashion Week is here – and, as Lela Rose, the Texan designer, says as she threads her needle and fits her models, “the show must go on.” “We need a little pick-me-up,” she emailed me, “and I actually think the upcoming week should be a way to move forward. That doesn’t mean we aren’t all facing reduced orders.”

Fashion week is an apt metaphor for what we are all doing: namely, getting on with our lives, still enjoying the “pick-me-ups” like lunches or dinners with friends, but in a different way from before. Friends email to ask me to lunch, but as we make the arrangements I’ve noticed we establish two or three weeks ahead of the engagement both who will be paying and where the venue will be. The unspoken reason for the latter is that there will an inbuilt cost for the person who has to travel.

Then there’s travel itself. It isn’t just Ken Lewis, chief executive of Bank of America, who finds it now takes him eight hours to get to congressional hearings in Washington rather than hopping on the corporate jet as he used to before we made him sell it. The rest of us now find when we travel we stay with friends, rather than in hotels, and we all fly economy, not business.

Of course, it’s necessary financially, but I do wonder if the result is really worth it. I discovered many years ago that if I had to step off a plane having missed a night’s sleep I was pretty hopeless at being productive. So I couldn’t help agreeing with New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg when he proclaimed that a journey of eight hours “was a hardly a good use of the CEO of Bank of America’s time.” Mayor Bloomberg added: “We’ve gotten so skittish about some of these things. The populist attitude of ‘Let’s go and cut out any frivolity’ just doesn’t make sense.”

He has a point. I’m all for regulating Wall Street and trimming the fat cats whose excesses led us down the path of destruction but let’s at least keep some perspective, and, above all, our humor and joy.

Lela Rose agrees, aesthetically, at least. She’s promised me she’ll show “jewel tones and really beautiful color, even a purple floral trench — not sad, depressing clothes.” After all, no one ever suggested that fashion needed to reflect reality.

This article was originally published by the London Evening Standard

The Guillotine Hasn’t Arrived Here Yet

These days it’s not just financial journalists who follow the movements of financiers. So, too, do the entertainment channels and press. Who could have predicted the day would come when OK! magazine would care what mode of transport Ken Lewis, Bank of America’s chief, uses? But according to the New York Times, these topics are now considered as interesting to readers as Britney Spears’s weight fluctuations.

In other words, the war on the rich is spreading fast. Inevitably the rich (who are still rich, even if their bank statements are a bit depleted) are not amused by this. One billionaire tells me he feels we are living in times where the spirit is akin to the French Revolution. In other words journalists are taking aim indiscriminately, like Robespierre’s out-of-control mob.

The analogy is ludicrously far-fetched: as far as I am aware, no Wall Street chief executive or other rich person has been guillotined.

Yet it is true that people with money are being scrutinized in a way they never used to be. Thus some of the Noel family, whose fund Fairfield Greenwich was the biggest feeder into Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, have finally got the message that it’s not seemly for them to be seen rocking out on the dance floor, given that so many of the firm’s investors lost up to $7 billion.

What is more astonishing is how long it has taken for the new “tone” to sink in. The truth is that many “society” people are still in denial. They want to pretend that nothing has changed.

I recently received an email from someone on the Westchester Land Trust committee. The committee had discovered that the hosts for its annual gala, Paul and Robin Greenwood, would now be unable to offer their home as a party venue, owing to “recent developments”, and could someone else please step in?

The letter did not spell out the “recent developments” – the fact that Greenwood has been arrested and charged with siphoning $500 million from his money-management business for personal use.

Spelling this out would obviously have been considered inelegant – but then so too is making off with someone else’s money. Eventually so-called polite society will have to choose whether to see things and people for what they really are. V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook

Esther Reed: How an Ordinary Girl Faked Her Way Into the Ivy League

T oday in a courtroom in South Carolina, Esther Elizabeth Reed’s fantasies finally ended. The 30-year-old brunette, who has spent eight of the past ten years on the run, often entering Ivy League schools under adopted fake identities, and evading cops with an extraordinary web of deception faces up to over four years in prison.

For one man,. Jon Campbell, a slight, sandy-haired tenacious investigator in the police department of the tiny town of Travelers Rest, South Carolina, it is the end of what became an obsessive case resembling the of the plot of Steven Spielberg’s Catch Me If You Can, starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hanks as the FBI detective Carl Hanratty always hotly in pursuit of his prey.  Campbell was Reed’s Hanratty.

In summer 2006 Campbell had received a phone call  from a police officer in New York. Campbell was informed that Brooke Henson, a beautiful young woman who had disappeared in peculiar circumstances from her family home in Travelers Rest in the early hours of  July 4th 1999 when she was just twenty — and had since become the town’s only unsolved missing person — had been found. She was, so Campbell was informed an honors student at the Ivy League school of Columbia on New York’s upper West Side.

New York police had gone to seek out the young woman on the Columbia campus after a New Yorker from whom she had been seeking part-time employment doing housework had googled her and seen she was listed as a missing person on the internet. Brooke Henson told police who interrogated her that she had no desire to be reunited with her family since she was a victim of domestic abuse. She wanted to be left alone to get on her with studies. She was very convincing. The New York police officer told Campbell that they intended to close Ms Henson’s file.

Campbell replied that they could close the case if they liked but there was no way the woman they had found was the real Brooke Henson. “Take some DNA” he suggested. “The Brooke Henson I knew could never have got into Columbia” he said into the phone. The girl he knew was a high-school dropout, a party girl.

Something in his voice made New York officer go the extra mile. The next day Campell’s phone rang again. Brooke Henson had failed to show for her DNA test. Campbell wasn’t surprised.

When, weeks later, New York cops forced entry into her apartment, they tripped over a pile of calling cards from New York officers. They had been dropped through the mailbox. They found no hair, no trace of anything that would have DNA. But they did find a video card, signed in Boston, Ma bearing the name “Natalie Bowman.”

Once again they called Campbell and relayed their findings. Who was the young woman if it wasn’t Brooke Henson?  Officially this was his case.  Campbell rolled up his sleeves and went to work. A 40-year-old graduate of Bob Jones university, he was more anxious than anyone to solve a mystery that had preyed on his mind and exasperated him for years.

Back in 2001 he had been assigned the case and handed two boxes of “indecipherable” material. He had re-interviewed dozens of local people and taken DNA samples to try solve what had really happened to Brooke Henson and found himself thwarted at every turn.

“Everyone in this town had a theory about what happened to Brooke,” he said. “But none of them was right.”

Particularly exasperating for him were the prank calls. There was a medium who claimed to have seen her body beside “yellow rope” and then there was the inmate from a neighboring jurisdiction who got cops to drive him around in the pouring rain and dig.

He was pretty sure Brooke Henson had been murdered  and he thought he knew who had done it and even probably where. He had just never found a body — much to his chagrin.

So, he was intrigued by whoever this impostor was, pretending to be Brooke. Maybe she had information that could help him; maybe she had known the young woman. First he had to find out who she was.

He began a lonely few months of phone calls and paper trails. He called Kim Finnergan head of security at Columbia. Finnergan was helpful at first but then stopped sending him documents once the school got “lawyered up.” Thereafter they cited privacy laws. Campbell had to get a federal subpoena to force them to continue to help him. It was like pulling teeth.

He learned there were two Natalie Bowmans. One was a dead end in that she is a bona fide a medical graduate student at Columbia and a former graduate of Harvard. Another one showed up, before two years at Columbia,  in Harvard’s records. He saw she had been on the debate team there in 2002. From there she had apparently vanished. Harvard had no record of her graduating. Like Columbia, Harvard was not helpful. But Campbell learned that in both places her file was flagged as a victim of domestic abuse. It is possible both knew “Natalie Bowman” or “Brooke Henson” was not her real name.

Campbell retraced the steps of Harvard debate team in 2002. Harvard had taken on Westpoint. A few more phone calls led him to Natalie Bowman’s former boyfriends – cadet officers who had been on Westpoint’s debate team and who had since left to take senior military postings, including the supservising of  others in Iraq.

He called the parents of one young man, in Detroit. Finally he got the name he was looking for; the young man’s parents believed the woman calling herself Natalie Bowman was really one, Esther Reed. They’d seen her driver’s license which been issued in Seattle.

In the fall of 2006 Campbell called cops in King County in Seattle. They traded photographs of the woman who had posed in New York as Brooke Henson and others of Esther Elizabeth Reed, a young woman who had last been seen in Seattle, in 1999. She had been convicted of credit card fraud and then broken off contact with her family, who had wondered if she’d been killed.

A corpse had found in Peasley Canyon, Washington, and until 2004, when DNA showed otherwise, local police believed it was Esther. When that was ruled out, police had speculated she’d been a victim of the “Green River Strangler,” discovered to be Gary Ridgeway, a serial killer convicted in 2003 of murdering 48 prostitutes over 25 years in Kings County.

Both woman bore an uncanny resemblance to one another. Both were slim and pretty with long lush dark hair. But Reed looked slimmer and had a more impish look; a wider smile and a knowing twinkle in her eyes.

Seattle police sent Esther Reed’s half sister, Edna Strom an email asking if the attached photograph was her sister. Strom got the email and gasped.

It was.

Thus began further investigation that got Campbell really riled up. Although theoretically the story of Esther Reed was not his case, as he pieced together her narrative in an attempt to learn how her path had crossed Brooke Henson’s the tale grew more and more remarkable.

How had Esther Reed, once an overweight high school dropout gotten herself into Ivy League schools — as someone else? Why had she taken on someone else’s identity, if not to rob them. Had she known her alias? How had she obtained the relevant social security numbers? How had she survived?

When finally it broke in the New York Post in January 2007, it jump-started the TV crews of America’s Most Wanted and news networks everywhere. Everyone wanted to know the same questions:

Boyfriends talked of cash wiring from German and the Netherlands: were these real?

And what had been the real subtext of her romantic relationships with the military. Was she a spy? There were so many peculiarities about the case that did not make sense.

“From a criminal standpoint we rarely find somebody who assumes somebody’s identity for any period of time,” says Det. John  Urquhart of King County, Seattle. “Typically they will do it long enough to clean out the bank accounts and then off they go. But she’s done this for a long period of time, more than once, to live as those persons.”

*****

Esther Elizabeth Reed was born on March 8, 1978, in the tiny town of Townsend, Montana, the youngest of eight children. Her father, Ernest “Ernie” Reed, was a woodworker and farm laborer. He married a woman named Florence when he was 32 and she was 40 and a single mother with seven children and two marriages behind her. Edna, one daughter, says that of her mother’s four husbands, Ernie, a god-fearing Baptist, was by far the most reliable, a truly good man. “My mother was a wonderful, attractive person,” Edna says “but she didn’t have the best taste in men.”

Though never affluent, Ernie made sure there was food on the table for his family, which mainly consisted of Esther and her brother, EJ, two years her senior, since the other children were mostly grown. She was a “pretty baby” according to another half-sister, Lori Devaney. But as she grew, Esther somehow never fit in, according to both Lori and Edna, partly because she was always a little overweight, and partly because she was so much younger than her half-siblings. She was always, says Lori, “manipulative…the kind of girl who when told not to touch something would put one finger on it to test boundaries.”

James Theriault who taught Esther in high school wondered for a long time if the girl was being abused, because she was so reclusive. “She had this shell,” he says.  So he put her on the debate team, and noticed that she was “highly intelligent” and outstandingly good. Her brother, EJ would later tell police that it didn’t matter which side of an argument she was told to argue on–she was equally good at everything. “She could convince you it was daylight outside in the middle of the night,” Sergeant Urquhart recalls EJ Reed telling him. EJ also told Edna that he gave up playing games like chess with his sister pretty early on — she was way too good for him.

Yet her grades were poor. “She thought she was too bright for high school,” says Lori.”[She thought] that the teachers were wasting her time.”

Meanwhile life at home was rocky. In 1991, after Ernie’s health deteriorated following a bout with meningitis, he and Flo separated. In 1992 Flo had surgery for cancer. In 1995 she moved out of Townsend and took Esther to Lynwood, near Seattle, where Esther enrolled in high school for just one year before dropping out. Weakened by her pain medication, Flo’s grasp on Esther slipped. “The rest of  you will be fine, but watch out for Esther,” she told Edna  as she was dying. Edna wasn’t sure why their mother was so concerned. But as she was going through her mother’s possessions, following her death in August 1998, she found a document that shocked her. It showed that Esther had been on probation for stealing (with a group of friends) in Townsend. Suddenly things started to add up for Edna, who was letting her sister live with her.

Edna and her husband and daughter would habitually throw in loose change an old jug for their annual vacation. It had gotten to the point where it was so full it was almost too heavy to lift. Suddenly the money vanished. So too did her daughter’s tooth-fairy money; then Edna’s purse went missing. By then Esther had moved out.

In the  late spring of 1999 the police notified Edna that someone was cashing her checks…and then in June they arrested Esther as the culprit.

During the summer of 1999 Edna sat in the visitors’ gallery at the courthouse in Kent, Seattle,  where she watched Esther, plead guilty to the credit card theft. Edna was sentenced to 35 days in jail, which had been converted to community service.  Grudgingly, through her fury Edna noticed that her younger sibling had gotten thin and “beautiful” –the  result of diet pills and jogging. Outside after the proceedings the two sisters had it out. Edna asked how, given their Baptist upbringing and everything the family had been through, Esther could have behaved like this? Stealing her own baby nieces’ tooth fairy money? Esther shrugged: “Because I didn’t think you’d really mind and because I could,” were more or less her answers, according to Edna.

(Court papers filed by Reed’s lawyer alleged her sister had called her “evil” and claim this  subsequently triggered panic and anxiety attacks in the young woman).

But emails from Esther to Edna offer a different insight into her amoral outlook, more or less the Bad Seed syndrome: “Usually there has always been something in my life that I hadn’t admitted to that I had done, so guilt was nothing new for me” she wrote. “Ever since I was a young kid, I have had urges of steeling [sic]. Most of the time I can overcome them. But as I got  older, the things I took got bigger and the schemes I pulled to get them got worse. When I was fourteen I learned how to lock myself up in a little box and I had no idea how to unlock it..when I steel [sic], I am able to shut off all feeling …it bothers me, but not like it should.”

She goes on: “Sitting in a jail cell will tell you there is a little bit more wrong than just saying no will fix…something inside of me is different. I don’t want to be the girl who let life pass her by because she was too afraid to live it.”

She signed herself “Liz,” not Esther, a sign of a new start.

*****

Later that summer Esther emailed her sister Edna that she’d quit working in nursing homes and was thinking of a career in the military and that she had taken up chess and was playing in tournaments. Her last email to Edna was in October 1999.

By then Edna and Lori were also receiving irate emails from one of Esther’s ex-boyfriends, Johnny Fisher, who was owed thousands of dollars in rent. Fisher had a sister, Natalie, then living in Germany. Esther enrolled as Natalie Fisher in a summer debate tournament in Arizona, where her abilities caught the eye of John Bruschke, the debate coach at Cal State Fullerton.

Bruschke suggested “Natalie” enroll at Cal State as an adjunct student–because that way she could sign up for classes more cheaply. She would not end up with a degree, but she could sign on to the debate team. She said she would finance this with her winnings from chess tournaments.

Bruschke was puzzled when Esther enrolled at Cal State, not as Natalie Fisher, which is how had known her,  but as Natalie Bowman. However he didn’t pry. The debate team at Cal State Fullerton was no stranger to members with  mixed-up backgrounds says Brushke. “We are kind of a place where people with unpleasant lives, but talent, find their way,” he says.

But even by Cal State standards Natalie Fisher/Bowman developed a reputation as a “crazy” girl among her peers. She was highly interested in the opposite sex recall both Bruschke and her philosophy teacher, Mitch Avila. But her relationships were extremely short-lived even by student standards, noted Brushke.

She was considered odd. “She didn’t trust anybody” says one of her debate team colleagues. One time “Natalie” complained to Brushke that the debate team had gotten bawdy and out-of-hand en route to a tournament–but when he looked into the matter he discovered that she had been the ringleader of the bawdiness. So why would she have complained?

Avila says she was clearly way beyond the rest of the philosophy students in his class. “It wasn’t remotely clear what she was doing there…she already knew all this stuff” he says. He was so suspicious he even checked her work for plagiarism but came up empty. In 2003, at her request,  he wrote her a letter of recommendation under the name Brooke Henson, because, she told him, she was being stalked and needed to change identities while she applied to a new college.

She wrote to him about the matter:

<blockquote>I was in your philosophy, I think 100, class last fall.  I was the debating chess player.  Anyways, last winter I decided to transfer from Fullerton to Loyola University in Chicago.  In between I went back to playing chess to get the money to pay for a school like that and I acquired a bit of a stalker.  Things got fairly complicated and I wasn’t able to attend Loyola for safety reasons, so I am now in the process of applying again, but to Northwestern and a couple of other better schools.  Apparently my scores allow me into better schools than I thought.  I will explain it better in person, but its a tricky situation and I know you once said you write letters of recommendation for students and I am in need of a good one.</blockquote>

Avila says he agreed to her request “because when you have a student facing you who says she is being stalked it’s very difficult to fight that…you tend to believe her.”

Neither Mitch Avila nor John Brushke were surprised when they read recently that their former student had gotten into Columbia and Harvard. “She was absolutely bright enough” says Brushke, adding that she didn’t strike him as a petty criminal: “Here’s the thing about a debate team … you are driving and hanging around with someone for 12 hours then you are living with them and are spending 16 hour days where you are in hotel rooms having meals with them,…if her intentions had been to steal she had ample opportunity.”

In 2003, according to Detective Jon Campbell, Esther, as Natalie Bowman, somehow joined the Harvard debate team. Records show that the real Natalie Bowman had debated for Harvard in 1999 and then went on to Columbia Medical school. This Natalie was in Peru when Esther impersonated her in Cambridge, Massachusetts, according to Campbell.

Why would Esther bother to get into Ivy League Schools under an assumed identity, when she could have used her considerable talents for more lucrative — or insidious — purposes is a question perplexing police. “If you are looking for motivation for Natalie, her character is very much like Kate in Lost,” says Brushke. James Theriault was left wondering why she felt she needed to be anyone else since in his opinion “she was quite bright enough to get into Harvard on her own…I can speculate that maybe she wanted to be somebody else.” Jon Campbell believes she is some sort of honey trap.

*****

Her phone text messages show that Esther/Natalie/Brooke dated many men while she was traveling the country debating, playing chess and attending college. Many of them were in service. Her text messages imply she was most serious about someone named “Tim,” a Naval Warfare Officer stationed on a ship out of Everett, Washington. “Tim” gave her a ring, she wrote in an instant message to one ex-boyfriend. Yet she was flirting with her correspondent, even as she told him that the ring meant a great deal to her–her first “diamond”.

Among the cadets at West Point she had flings with Kyle Brengel, in 2006 stationed in Alaska, and Ian Fleishmann, then supervising officers in Iraq.

Fleishmann’s father, Fred,  from Michigan, was suspicious of his son’s new girlfriend–then calling herself Natalie Fisher — right from the start.  While she was clearly smart and attractive she was very reticent when it came to information about herself.

“The guys were not involved with her seriously — they were in this for wild sex,” explains Det. Campbell. “They’ve all been interviewed — and none of them passed on any classified information. If they had, that would considered a very serious — as in treasonable — offence by the army; it’s clear that did not happen.”

In 2002, while dating Ian Fleishmann and visiting him at his parent’s home in Michigan,  Fleishmann’s mother, Shirley, a professor at Annapolis, backed their car out of the garage and accidentally hit Natalie’s red Honda Accord. Strangely, the young woman refused to give her insurance details or ever cash a check that Fleishmann’s wrote for two and a half thousand dollars. Fred Fleishmann couldn’t understand why the young woman wouldn’t let him take the car to get it fixed. He also wanted to give her a map of the area and went out to his driveway to put one in her glove compartment while she and his son were at the beach. To his astonishment he found several drivers’ licenses, including Esther Reed’s.

He started to pay more attention to the young woman, particularly when she suggested that she and his son share a cell phone so they could speak regularly: (West Point hours don’t allow much free time) and the bills came to his home. He noticed that she was calling all the time — and from all over America.”She claimed she was playing chess tournaments, but I wondered,,” says Fleishmann, who looked up the tournaments and saw no sign of her.

Meanwhile, his son was growing weary of the girl’s barrage of phone calls and they lost touch. Detective Campbell says Ian Fleishmann has subsequently told him that “Natalie” became a pest.

Last fall, out of the blue, Fred Fleishman received a call from Jon Campbell inquiring about the young woman his son used to date. According to Campbell, Fleishmann said wryly “I’d been wondering when my phone was going to ring about her.”

*****

“The Box” is the name of an essay that investigators took from the hard drive of a computer belonging to one former Westpoint cadet Esther dated named Kyle Brengel, once stationed in Alaska. Though it isn’t the essay that Esther Reed used to impersonate Brooke Henson to get into Columbia in 2004 — for that, according to Det. Campbell, she cleverly took biographical details off the Brooke Henson website-the two-page text was clearly a practice effort.

Some of it reads as follows:

<blockquote>When I tell people my life story, I have never received a response not laced with either shock or disapproval. My parents were extremely strict Southern Baptists. Unless someone followed their strict code of conduct, I wasn’t allowed contact with them. This isolation was achieved by raising me in a small town in South Carolina with a population of one thousand  people…I was educated in a private setting situated in our twenty -five member church. To complete my protection, during my school day, five foot dividers were placed on each side of the five student’s desks line against the wall….

Even though I was never forced to understand the concept of the box, I have learned some of the answers to my questions. A box is slowly constructed around every child by every person they’ve ever crossed paths with.  A teacher telling a child he learn that until the fourth grade places a brick in a child’s wall…an older brother’s friend pushing him away from the table saying he can’t play chess because he’s too young and would never understand it adds mortar to the bricks already in place…

My isolation gifted me with the ability to only comprehend the limitations I discovered through failure of one of my ideas or experiments. No one’s disapproval or doubt ever hindered me from attempting anything my little imagination could concoct. If I thought I could do something, I would attempt it until I was successful….my personal philosophy quickly turned into: “whatever you say, but as soon as you leave, I’ll find a way to do it.</blockquote>

*****

In 2004 Esther somehow got access to Brooke Henson’s social security number. Jon Campbell says she did so through police computers in Vermont. “She must have been with someone who had access to them,” he says. Records showed him that the number was run twice; “It’s what we call a “Ping,” Campbell says.”You run it once and you wait. Do you get a reaction?” If you do then you know it’s a hot number and you’ll get a phone call ….If nothing happens, you run it again, and you’re good to go.” Because Brooke Henson was not listed on a national “wanted” list, no one had bothered to flag her file, which meant no red flags went off when someone ran her social security number.

In the fall of 2004, armed with letters from Professor Mitch Avila and Ian Fleishmann’s mother, a  professor at Annapolis, a yarn about domestic abuse, and calling herself “Brook” without an “e,” Esther got in to Columbia–before she had obtained  a copy of the real Brooke Henson’s birth certificate from South Carolina’s Department of Health and Education –which took two attempts, according to Campbell.

Her essay to the school “talked about her mother dying,” says Campbell,”It has bits of truth from her real life woven into a story tailored to fit what she thought Brooke’s life might have been like. Brooke’s life was no where near the life Esther described though.”

She attended Columbia from 2004 to 2006. Her gradepoint average was 3.2216. She took courses in intro-developmental psychology, organizational psychology, social cognition, emotion and gender in Muslim studies, sociology of the US economy, introduction to psychology, introduction to political thought, origins of humanity, criminology, algebra, human rights and social justice, university writing, and astrology.

“Weird” said Campbell looking at her choice of courses and the fact that she withdrew from many of them in mid semester.. “Completely weird.”

He was not alone in finding her behavior incomprehensible. In the summer of 2005, through the on-line dating service match.com, she met a New York-based fire-fighter, a handsome dark-haired young man, who had lunch with me, but asked to keep his identity anonymous.

“Brook” and he first got together at a downtown bar. She’d been wearing a blue turtle-neck and blue jeans, and she made no bones about what she wanted from him: sex. “She was not the kind of girl you would take home to meet  your mother,” he says bluntly.

Yet, although he never intended a serious relationship — she traveled far too much to play in her alleged chess tournaments, on top of which she said she had a boyfriend “somewhere in the south” (the fireman got the impression he “didn’t treat her well”) — he was put out when she frequently avoided seeing him, citing a social phobic disorder. “She would repeatedly tell me she couldn’t see me until the end of the semester, yet she would call all the time,” he says.

They quarreled.

As proof of her illness, in 2006, she sent him a letter written by a psychologist at St Luke’s Roosevelt hospital, stating that she had been treating the woman for “social phobia,”and that this would be interfering with her studies at Columbia. “Brook” wrote to the firefighter that obviously the doctor “exaggerates my stuff a bit to make sure Columbia gets off my back….my gp and the number of Ws should let you know this is probably a pretty big priority in my life right now.”

The firefighter last saw her the summer of 2006; In January when the news stories broke he found himself reading about her in the New York Post. He saw her photograph and was shocked. It had not occurred to him to check up on her.

*****

For the real Brooke Henson’s family, 2007  was a year of intense highs and lows. First, in the summer there was the news that Brooke was alive — which in itself was remarkable.

If you drive on a bright, cold winter’s day along Highway 276, a wide empty road that climbs north from Travelers Rest, you see the looming contours of the Blue Ridge Mountains. There is woodland on both sides of the road, and the signs pointing out the way to “bible camp” and the local carpenter. It all seems quaint and friendly.

But is was on this road, sometime after 2:00 am, on the weekend of July 4, 1999, that  Brooke Henson, one of the town’s prettier girls, vanished. She was last seen walking toward the Willis store, the only store in the center of the sprawled-out  town, to buy a packet of cigarettes.

It was a Saturday night, and the five foot four brunette had earlier had an argument with her boyfriend, Shaun Shirley, 30, a good-looking local contractor. He had had regular run-ins with the cops, according to his long rap sheet, which listed among other felonies, sexual assault of minors and lynching.

That evening Brook’s parents — Martin, a former brick mason and Cathy, who worked at the local Eckerd’s pharmacy — had returned from an Allman Brothers concert in Charlotte to find Brooke in tears on the porch. She was dressed in shorts, a tank-top, and flip flops, a silver watch on one wrist, a silver bracelet on the other. She told her father she was going to break up with Shirley and leave town. Her father wasn’t sad. He, like many in the local community, was afraid of Shirley, who had acquired a reputation as someone not to mess with.

“I’ll be back in five years,” Brooke told her father, according to Christie Metcalf, Brooke’s aunt.

Metcalf came to talk to me in the Travelers Rest police station, a small nondescript building in the middle of town, where the less dangerous prisoners hang out around tables with the police officers. “We just knew something wasn’t right the next day” Metcalf, a blonde in her fifties, says. “But we couldn’t get the police to take it seriously.” After all, Brooke had run away from home before.”It was three weeks before the police treated it as a missing person’s case and began a search mission and by then we’d had rain so what were the dogs going to find?”

The present generation of police admits their predecessors mishandled the case. “The lieutenant…should have turned the case over to the sheriff’s office and never even taken a report. If he had done that, then homicide detectives would have been doing the interviews of the suspects and witnesses rather than patrol officers with zero experience in solving murder cases,” says Campbell.

The Hensons marriage fell apart in the wake of their daughter’s disappearance. Martin, ill with multiple sclerosis, became a recluse. For five years he believed his daughter would return.  Cathy quit her job and suffered from debilitating anxiety. When Campbell arranged for her to take a DNA blood test he had to carry her to the car.

In 2002 Christie Metcalf befriended a woman named Tammy Welch, who recommended they put up the website for Brooke. Tammy sought help from a medium, who had a vision of Brooke at the bottom of a well, with a yellow rope near by. now, every year on July 4, the family holds a vigil at the police station, reminding officers of their failure. (Brooke is the only missing person in the area that has never been found)

Detective Campbell was more than a little frustrated.

Campbell is convinced Brooke was murdered–not near Travelers Rest, but up near River Falls, a beautiful spot where young people liked to party. The person Campbell really wanted to question was Shaun Shirley, who was hauled into police custody the weekend of Brooke’s disappearance for “abusing two minors.” Shirley swiftly “got lawyered up” and had nothing to say, according to Campbell. He is now lives up nearer the mountains.

Campbell planned to re-interview another former boyfriend of Brooke’s, whom she had dated before Shirley. “There was a story she was planning to run away with him and that’s why she was killed,” Campbell says. But he died of an overdose before Campbell got to him. “It was ruled a suicide,” says Campbell.” Some people think he was killed.”

Thus last summer when Campbell got the call from New York, he was never likely to believe it. He might not have believed in retrospect how hard a slog it would be to piece together what happened to Esther.

Now he believes it unlikely the two women ever  met. “I think Esther was just looking for a new ID and came across Brooke’s story on line.”

Ironically Brooke’s biography only got pasted on the internet in 2004, thanks to the zeal of Tammy Welch, and Esther’s own story got put there too on police computers, thanks to her sister Lori’s bad dreams..

Tragically Brooke Henson’s family were euphoric when they first heard she had been found. “We believed it because her father had said she would be back [after five years], because she had said that what she was going to do,” says her aunt, Christy Metcalf.; then the family learned there was an impostor our there pretending to be her.

“It was the most devastating feeling” says Metcalf’s friend, Tammy Welch.

A new detective took over the Brooke Henson investigation, following the promotion of Det. Jon Campbell from the local station to the state’s SLED. Campbell said he would help out where he could.

The limelight gave the local police an incentive to retrace old steps, re-interview everyone — and to rebuild fences with the community. “We are hoping with this attention we can find out what happened Brooke,” says Christy Metcalf, adding the family would like to talk to Esther Reed to discover what she knows, if anything, about Brooke Henson. At the time of this writing, no meeting took place.

Esther Reed’s family were relieved to learn that she was alive — their last communication with her had been a typed letter from Oklahoma City in 2002, which they had feared was sent from someone else — but they were concerned.

The federal Secret Service sent its data on Reed, to the South Carolina District Attorney who could then issue a federal arrest warrant.

In February 2007 there was a report Reed had been seen in a restaurant in San Francisco. Edna Strom did not believe it. “Whatever she has gotten herself into, I just want her  to turn herself in,” she says over breakfast in a hotel in Portland, Oregon. “She’s at the point when she knows she will have to pay for whatever she’s done, but she can still get her life back… start over.”

Over on the other coast, Jon Campbell was more cynical. “This girl knows what to do, how to do it, and she will already be several steps ahead of the authorities,” he says.

The slow pace of the investigation had driven him a little crazy. This is a man, after all, who took his wife to the spy museum in Washington DC on their honeymoon. He admitted that, despite the better pay, he was sad to have been promoted off the case. But he was confident that authorities would eventually find Reed. “Yeah” he says coolly. “I think so. Eventually.”

He was right. Last January, Reed, was picked up outside Chicago. This time she surrendered willingly. Did she have regrets? Would she do it again. “I wasn’t say I was tired of running “from the law” she told officers.

But as of now, the law is done with her.

Vicky Ward is a Contributing editor to Vanity Fair Today in a courtroom in South Carolina, Esther Elizabeth Reed’s fantasies finally ended. The 30-year-old brunette, who has spent eight of the past ten years on the run, often entering Ivy League schools under adopted fake identities, and evading cops with an extraordinary web of deception faces up to over four years in prison.

For one man,. Jon Campbell, a slight, sandy-haired tenacious investigator in the police department of the tiny town of Travelers Rest, South Carolina, it is the end of what became an obsessive case resembling the of the plot of Steven Spielberg’s Catch Me If You Can, starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hanks as the FBI detective Carl Hanratty always hotly in pursuit of his prey.  Campbell was Reed’s Hanratty.

In summer 2006 Campbell had received a phone call  from a police officer in New York. Campbell was informed that Brooke Henson, a beautiful young woman who had disappeared in peculiar circumstances from her family home in Travelers Rest in the early hours of  July 4th 1999 when she was just twenty — and had since become the town’s only unsolved missing person — had been found. She was, so Campbell was informed an honors student at the Ivy League school of Columbia on New York’s upper West Side.

New York police had gone to seek out the young woman on the Columbia campus after a New Yorker from whom she had been seeking part-time employment doing housework had googled her and seen she was listed as a missing person on the internet. Brooke Henson told police who interrogated her that she had no desire to be reunited with her family since she was a victim of domestic abuse. She wanted to be left alone to get on her with studies. She was very convincing. The New York police officer told Campbell that they intended to close Ms Henson’s file.

Campbell replied that they could close the case if they liked but there was no way the woman they had found was the real Brooke Henson. “Take some DNA” he suggested. “The Brooke Henson I knew could never have got into Columbia” he said into the phone. The girl he knew was a high-school dropout, a party girl.

Something in his voice made New York officer go the extra mile. The next day Campell’s phone rang again. Brooke Henson had failed to show for her DNA test. Campbell wasn’t surprised.

When, weeks later, New York cops forced entry into her apartment, they tripped over a pile of calling cards from New York officers. They had been dropped through the mailbox. They found no hair, no trace of anything that would have DNA. But they did find a video card, signed in Boston, Ma bearing the name “Natalie Bowman.”

Once again they called Campbell and relayed their findings. Who was the young woman if it wasn’t Brooke Henson?  Officially this was his case.  Campbell rolled up his sleeves and went to work. A 40-year-old graduate of Bob Jones university, he was more anxious than anyone to solve a mystery that had preyed on his mind and exasperated him for years.

Back in 2001 he had been assigned the case and handed two boxes of “indecipherable” material. He had re-interviewed dozens of local people and taken DNA samples to try solve what had really happened to Brooke Henson and found himself thwarted at every turn.

“Everyone in this town had a theory about what happened to Brooke,” he said. “But none of them was right.”

Particularly exasperating for him were the prank calls. There was a medium who claimed to have seen her body beside “yellow rope” and then there was the inmate from a neighboring jurisdiction who got cops to drive him around in the pouring rain and dig.

He was pretty sure Brooke Henson had been murdered  and he thought he knew who had done it and even probably where. He had just never found a body — much to his chagrin.

So, he was intrigued by whoever this impostor was, pretending to be Brooke. Maybe she had information that could help him; maybe she had known the young woman. First he had to find out who she was.

He began a lonely few months of phone calls and paper trails. He called Kim Finnergan head of security at Columbia. Finnergan was helpful at first but then stopped sending him documents once the school got “lawyered up.” Thereafter they cited privacy laws. Campbell had to get a federal subpoena to force them to continue to help him. It was like pulling teeth.

He learned there were two Natalie Bowmans. One was a dead end in that she is a bona fide a medical graduate student at Columbia and a former graduate of Harvard. Another one showed up, before two years at Columbia,  in Harvard’s records. He saw she had been on the debate team there in 2002. From there she had apparently vanished. Harvard had no record of her graduating. Like Columbia, Harvard was not helpful. But Campbell learned that in both places her file was flagged as a victim of domestic abuse. It is possible both knew “Natalie Bowman” or “Brooke Henson” was not her real name.

Campbell retraced the steps of Harvard debate team in 2002. Harvard had taken on Westpoint. A few more phone calls led him to Natalie Bowman’s former boyfriends – cadet officers who had been on Westpoint’s debate team and who had since left to take senior military postings, including the supservising of  others in Iraq.

He called the parents of one young man, in Detroit. Finally he got the name he was looking for; the young man’s parents believed the woman calling herself Natalie Bowman was really one, Esther Reed. They’d seen her driver’s license which been issued in Seattle.

In the fall of 2006 Campbell called cops in King County in Seattle. They traded photographs of the woman who had posed in New York as Brooke Henson and others of Esther Elizabeth Reed, a young woman who had last been seen in Seattle, in 1999. She had been convicted of credit card fraud and then broken off contact with her family, who had wondered if she’d been killed.

A corpse had found in Peasley Canyon, Washington, and until 2004, when DNA showed otherwise, local police believed it was Esther. When that was ruled out, police had speculated she’d been a victim of the “Green River Strangler,” discovered to be Gary Ridgeway, a serial killer convicted in 2003 of murdering 48 prostitutes over 25 years in Kings County.

Both woman bore an uncanny resemblance to one another. Both were slim and pretty with long lush dark hair. But Reed looked slimmer and had a more impish look; a wider smile and a knowing twinkle in her eyes.

Seattle police sent Esther Reed’s half sister, Edna Strom an email asking if the attached photograph was her sister. Strom got the email and gasped.

It was.

Thus began further investigation that got Campbell really riled up. Although theoretically the story of Esther Reed was not his case, as he pieced together her narrative in an attempt to learn how her path had crossed Brooke Henson’s the tale grew more and more remarkable.

How had Esther Reed, once an overweight high school dropout gotten herself into Ivy League schools — as someone else? Why had she taken on someone else’s identity, if not to rob them. Had she known her alias? How had she obtained the relevant social security numbers? How had she survived?

When finally it broke in the New York Post in January 2007, it jump-started the TV crews of America’s Most Wanted and news networks everywhere. Everyone wanted to know the same questions:

Boyfriends talked of cash wiring from German and the Netherlands: were these real?

And what had been the real subtext of her romantic relationships with the military. Was she a spy? There were so many peculiarities about the case that did not make sense.

“From a criminal standpoint we rarely find somebody who assumes somebody’s identity for any period of time,” says Det. John  Urquhart of King County, Seattle. “Typically they will do it long enough to clean out the bank accounts and then off they go. But she’s done this for a long period of time, more than once, to live as those persons.”

*****

Esther Elizabeth Reed was born on March 8, 1978, in the tiny town of Townsend, Montana, the youngest of eight children. Her father, Ernest “Ernie” Reed, was a woodworker and farm laborer. He married a woman named Florence when he was 32 and she was 40 and a single mother with seven children and two marriages behind her. Edna, one daughter, says that of her mother’s four husbands, Ernie, a god-fearing Baptist, was by far the most reliable, a truly good man. “My mother was a wonderful, attractive person,” Edna says “but she didn’t have the best taste in men.”

Though never affluent, Ernie made sure there was food on the table for his family, which mainly consisted of Esther and her brother, EJ, two years her senior, since the other children were mostly grown. She was a “pretty baby” according to another half-sister, Lori Devaney. But as she grew, Esther somehow never fit in, according to both Lori and Edna, partly because she was always a little overweight, and partly because she was so much younger than her half-siblings. She was always, says Lori, “manipulative…the kind of girl who when told not to touch something would put one finger on it to test boundaries.”

James Theriault who taught Esther in high school wondered for a long time if the girl was being abused, because she was so reclusive. “She had this shell,” he says.  So he put her on the debate team, and noticed that she was “highly intelligent” and outstandingly good. Her brother, EJ would later tell police that it didn’t matter which side of an argument she was told to argue on–she was equally good at everything. “She could convince you it was daylight outside in the middle of the night,” Sergeant Urquhart recalls EJ Reed telling him. EJ also told Edna that he gave up playing games like chess with his sister pretty early on — she was way too good for him.

Yet her grades were poor. “She thought she was too bright for high school,” says Lori.”[She thought] that the teachers were wasting her time.”

Meanwhile life at home was rocky. In 1991, after Ernie’s health deteriorated following a bout with meningitis, he and Flo separated. In 1992 Flo had surgery for cancer. In 1995 she moved out of Townsend and took Esther to Lynwood, near Seattle, where Esther enrolled in high school for just one year before dropping out. Weakened by her pain medication, Flo’s grasp on Esther slipped. “The rest of  you will be fine, but watch out for Esther,” she told Edna  as she was dying. Edna wasn’t sure why their mother was so concerned. But as she was going through her mother’s possessions, following her death in August 1998, she found a document that shocked her. It showed that Esther had been on probation for stealing (with a group of friends) in Townsend. Suddenly things started to add up for Edna, who was letting her sister live with her.

Edna and her husband and daughter would habitually throw in loose change an old jug for their annual vacation. It had gotten to the point where it was so full it was almost too heavy to lift. Suddenly the money vanished. So too did her daughter’s tooth-fairy money; then Edna’s purse went missing. By then Esther had moved out.

In the  late spring of 1999 the police notified Edna that someone was cashing her checks…and then in June they arrested Esther as the culprit.

During the summer of 1999 Edna sat in the visitors’ gallery at the courthouse in Kent, Seattle,  where she watched Esther, plead guilty to the credit card theft. Edna was sentenced to 35 days in jail, which had been converted to community service.  Grudgingly, through her fury Edna noticed that her younger sibling had gotten thin and “beautiful” –the  result of diet pills and jogging. Outside after the proceedings the two sisters had it out. Edna asked how, given their Baptist upbringing and everything the family had been through, Esther could have behaved like this? Stealing her own baby nieces’ tooth fairy money? Esther shrugged: “Because I didn’t think you’d really mind and because I could,” were more or less her answers, according to Edna.

(Court papers filed by Reed’s lawyer alleged her sister had called her “evil” and claim this  subsequently triggered panic and anxiety attacks in the young woman).

But emails from Esther to Edna offer a different insight into her amoral outlook, more or less the Bad Seed syndrome: “Usually there has always been something in my life that I hadn’t admitted to that I had done, so guilt was nothing new for me” she wrote. “Ever since I was a young kid, I have had urges of steeling [sic]. Most of the time I can overcome them. But as I got  older, the things I took got bigger and the schemes I pulled to get them got worse. When I was fourteen I learned how to lock myself up in a little box and I had no idea how to unlock it..when I steel [sic], I am able to shut off all feeling …it bothers me, but not like it should.”

She goes on: “Sitting in a jail cell will tell you there is a little bit more wrong than just saying no will fix…something inside of me is different. I don’t want to be the girl who let life pass her by because she was too afraid to live it.”

She signed herself “Liz,” not Esther, a sign of a new start.

*****

Later that summer Esther emailed her sister Edna that she’d quit working in nursing homes and was thinking of a career in the military and that she had taken up chess and was playing in tournaments. Her last email to Edna was in October 1999.

By then Edna and Lori were also receiving irate emails from one of Esther’s ex-boyfriends, Johnny Fisher, who was owed thousands of dollars in rent. Fisher had a sister, Natalie, then living in Germany. Esther enrolled as Natalie Fisher in a summer debate tournament in Arizona, where her abilities caught the eye of John Bruschke, the debate coach at Cal State Fullerton.

Bruschke suggested “Natalie” enroll at Cal State as an adjunct student–because that way she could sign up for classes more cheaply. She would not end up with a degree, but she could sign on to the debate team. She said she would finance this with her winnings from chess tournaments.

Bruschke was puzzled when Esther enrolled at Cal State, not as Natalie Fisher, which is how had known her,  but as Natalie Bowman. However he didn’t pry. The debate team at Cal State Fullerton was no stranger to members with  mixed-up backgrounds says Brushke. “We are kind of a place where people with unpleasant lives, but talent, find their way,” he says.

But even by Cal State standards Natalie Fisher/Bowman developed a reputation as a “crazy” girl among her peers. She was highly interested in the opposite sex recall both Bruschke and her philosophy teacher, Mitch Avila. But her relationships were extremely short-lived even by student standards, noted Brushke.

She was considered odd. “She didn’t trust anybody” says one of her debate team colleagues. One time “Natalie” complained to Brushke that the debate team had gotten bawdy and out-of-hand en route to a tournament–but when he looked into the matter he discovered that she had been the ringleader of the bawdiness. So why would she have complained?

Avila says she was clearly way beyond the rest of the philosophy students in his class. “It wasn’t remotely clear what she was doing there…she already knew all this stuff” he says. He was so suspicious he even checked her work for plagiarism but came up empty. In 2003, at her request,  he wrote her a letter of recommendation under the name Brooke Henson, because, she told him, she was being stalked and needed to change identities while she applied to a new college.

She wrote to him about the matter:

<blockquote>I was in your philosophy, I think 100, class last fall.  I was the debating chess player.  Anyways, last winter I decided to transfer from Fullerton to Loyola University in Chicago.  In between I went back to playing chess to get the money to pay for a school like that and I acquired a bit of a stalker.  Things got fairly complicated and I wasn’t able to attend Loyola for safety reasons, so I am now in the process of applying again, but to Northwestern and a couple of other better schools.  Apparently my scores allow me into better schools than I thought.  I will explain it better in person, but its a tricky situation and I know you once said you write letters of recommendation for students and I am in need of a good one.</blockquote>

Avila says he agreed to her request “because when you have a student facing you who says she is being stalked it’s very difficult to fight that…you tend to believe her.”

Neither Mitch Avila nor John Brushke were surprised when they read recently that their former student had gotten into Columbia and Harvard. “She was absolutely bright enough” says Brushke, adding that she didn’t strike him as a petty criminal: “Here’s the thing about a debate team … you are driving and hanging around with someone for 12 hours then you are living with them and are spending 16 hour days where you are in hotel rooms having meals with them,…if her intentions had been to steal she had ample opportunity.”

In 2003, according to Detective Jon Campbell, Esther, as Natalie Bowman, somehow joined the Harvard debate team. Records show that the real Natalie Bowman had debated for Harvard in 1999 and then went on to Columbia Medical school. This Natalie was in Peru when Esther impersonated her in Cambridge, Massachusetts, according to Campbell.

Why would Esther bother to get into Ivy League Schools under an assumed identity, when she could have used her considerable talents for more lucrative — or insidious — purposes is a question perplexing police. “If you are looking for motivation for Natalie, her character is very much like Kate in Lost,” says Brushke. James Theriault was left wondering why she felt she needed to be anyone else since in his opinion “she was quite bright enough to get into Harvard on her own…I can speculate that maybe she wanted to be somebody else.” Jon Campbell believes she is some sort of honey trap.

*****

Her phone text messages show that Esther/Natalie/Brooke dated many men while she was traveling the country debating, playing chess and attending college. Many of them were in service. Her text messages imply she was most serious about someone named “Tim,” a Naval Warfare Officer stationed on a ship out of Everett, Washington. “Tim” gave her a ring, she wrote in an instant message to one ex-boyfriend. Yet she was flirting with her correspondent, even as she told him that the ring meant a great deal to her–her first “diamond”.

Among the cadets at West Point she had flings with Daniel Ebarb, Kyle Brengel, in 2006 stationed in Alaska, and Ian Fleishmann, then supervising officers in Iraq.

Fleishmann’s father, Fred,  from Michigan, was suspicious of his son’s new girlfriend–then calling herself Natalie Fisher — right from the start.  While she was clearly smart and attractive she was very reticent when it came to information about herself.

“The guys were not involved with her seriously — they were in this for wild sex,” explains Det. Campbell. “They’ve all been interviewed — and none of them passed on any classified information. If they had, that would considered a very serious — as in treasonable — offence by the army; it’s clear that did not happen.”

In 2002, while dating Ian Fleishmann and visiting him at his parent’s home in Michigan,  Fleishmann’s mother, Shirley, a professor at Annapolis, backed their car out of the garage and accidentally hit Natalie’s red Honda Accord. Strangely, the young woman refused to give her insurance details or ever cash a check that Fleishmann’s wrote for two and a half thousand dollars. Fred Fleishmann couldn’t understand why the young woman wouldn’t let him take the car to get it fixed. He also wanted to give her a map of the area and went out to his driveway to put one in her glove compartment while she and his son were at the beach. To his astonishment he found several drivers’ licenses, including Esther Reed’s.

He started to pay more attention to the young woman, particularly when she suggested that she and his son share a cell phone so they could speak regularly: (West Point hours don’t allow much free time) and the bills came to his home. He noticed that she was calling all the time — and from all over America.”She claimed she was playing chess tournaments, but I wondered,,” says Fleishmann, who looked up the tournaments and saw no sign of her.

Meanwhile, his son was growing weary of the girl’s barrage of phone calls and they lost touch. Detective Campbell says Ian Fleishmann has subsequently told him that “Natalie” became a pest.

Last fall, out of the blue, Fred Fleishman received a call from Jon Campbell inquiring about the young woman his son used to date. According to Campbell, Fleishmann said wryly “I’d been wondering when my phone was going to ring about her.”

*****

“The Box” is the name of an essay that investigators took from the hard drive of a computer belonging to one former Westpoint cadet Esther dated named Kyle Brengel, once stationed in Alaska. Though it isn’t the essay that Esther Reed used to impersonate Brooke Henson to get into Columbia in 2004 — for that, according to Det. Campbell, she cleverly took biographical details off the Brooke Henson website-the two-page text was clearly a practice effort.

Some of it reads as follows:

<blockquote>When I tell people my life story, I have never received a response not laced with either shock or disapproval. My parents were extremely strict Southern Baptists. Unless someone followed their strict code of conduct, I wasn’t allowed contact with them. This isolation was achieved by raising me in a small town in South Carolina with a population of one thousand  people…I was educated in a private setting situated in our twenty -five member church. To complete my protection, during my school day, five foot dividers were placed on each side of the five student’s desks line against the wall….

Even though I was never forced to understand the concept of the box, I have learned some of the answers to my questions. A box is slowly constructed around every child by every person they’ve ever crossed paths with.  A teacher telling a child he learn that until the fourth grade places a brick in a child’s wall…an older brother’s friend pushing him away from the table saying he can’t play chess because he’s too young and would never understand it adds mortar to the bricks already in place…

My isolation gifted me with the ability to only comprehend the limitations I discovered through failure of one of my ideas or experiments. No one’s disapproval or doubt ever hindered me from attempting anything my little imagination could concoct. If I thought I could do something, I would attempt it until I was successful….my personal philosophy quickly turned into: “whatever you say, but as soon as you leave, I’ll find a way to do it.</blockquote>

*****

In 2004 Esther somehow got access to Brooke Henson’s social security number. Jon Campbell says she did so through police computers in Vermont. “She must have been with someone who had access to them,” he says. Records showed him that the number was run twice; “It’s what we call a “Ping,” Campbell says.”You run it once and you wait. Do you get a reaction?” If you do then you know it’s a hot number and you’ll get a phone call ….If nothing happens, you run it again, and you’re good to go.” Because Brooke Henson was not listed on a national “wanted” list, no one had bothered to flag her file, which meant no red flags went off when someone ran her social security number.

In the fall of 2004, armed with letters from Professor Mitch Avila and Ian Fleishmann’s mother, a  professor at Annapolis, a yarn about domestic abuse, and calling herself “Brook” without an “e,” Esther got in to Columbia–before she had obtained  a copy of the real Brooke Henson’s birth certificate from South Carolina’s Department of Health and Education –which took two attempts, according to Campbell.

Her essay to the school “talked about her mother dying,” says Campbell,”It has bits of truth from her real life woven into a story tailored to fit what she thought Brooke’s life might have been like. Brooke’s life was no where near the life Esther described though.”

She attended Columbia from 2004 to 2006. Her gradepoint average was 3.2216. She took courses in intro-developmental psychology, organizational psychology, social cognition, emotion and gender in Muslim studies, sociology of the US economy, introduction to psychology, introduction to political thought, origins of humanity, criminology, algebra, human rights and social justice, university writing, and astrology.

“Weird” said Campbell looking at her choice of courses and the fact that she withdrew from many of them in mid semester.. “Completely weird.”

He was not alone in finding her behavior incomprehensible. In the summer of 2005, through the on-line dating service match.com, she met a New York-based fire-fighter, a handsome dark-haired young man, who had lunch with me, but asked to keep his identity anonymous.

“Brook” and he first got together at a downtown bar. She’d been wearing a blue turtle-neck and blue jeans, and she made no bones about what she wanted from him: sex. “She was not the kind of girl you would take home to meet  your mother,” he says bluntly.

Yet, although he never intended a serious relationship — she traveled far too much to play in her alleged chess tournaments, on top of which she said she had a boyfriend “somewhere in the south” (the fireman got the impression he “didn’t treat her well”) — he was put out when she frequently avoided seeing him, citing a social phobic disorder. “She would repeatedly tell me she couldn’t see me until the end of the semester, yet she would call all the time,” he says.

They quarreled.

As proof of her illness, in 2006, she sent him a letter written by a psychologist at St Luke’s Roosevelt hospital, stating that she had been treating the woman for “social phobia,”and that this would be interfering with her studies at Columbia. “Brook” wrote to the firefighter that obviously the doctor “exaggerates my stuff a bit to make sure Columbia gets off my back….my gp and the number of Ws should let you know this is probably a pretty big priority in my life right now.”

The firefighter last saw her the summer of 2006; In January when the news stories broke he found himself reading about her in the New York Post. He saw her photograph and was shocked. It had not occurred to him to check up on her.

*****

For the real Brooke Henson’s family, 2007  was a year of intense highs and lows. First, in the summer there was the news that Brooke was alive — which in itself was remarkable.

If you drive on a bright, cold winter’s day along Highway 276, a wide empty road that climbs north from Travelers Rest, you see the looming contours of the Blue Ridge Mountains. There is woodland on both sides of the road, and the signs pointing out the way to “bible camp” and the local carpenter. It all seems quaint and friendly.

But is was on this road, sometime after 2:00 am, on the weekend of July 4, 1999, that  Brooke Henson, one of the town’s prettier girls, vanished. She was last seen walking toward the Willis store, the only store in the center of the sprawled-out  town, to buy a packet of cigarettes.

It was a Saturday night, and the five foot four brunette had earlier had an argument with her boyfriend, Shaun Shirley, 30, a good-looking local contractor. He had had regular run-ins with the cops, according to his long rap sheet, which listed among other felonies, sexual assault of minors and lynching.

That evening Brook’s parents — Martin, a former brick mason and Cathy, who worked at the local Eckerd’s pharmacy — had returned from an Allman Brothers concert in Charlotte to find Brooke in tears on the porch. She was dressed in shorts, a tank-top, and flip flops, a silver watch on one wrist, a silver bracelet on the other. She told her father she was going to break up with Shirley and leave town. Her father wasn’t sad. He, like many in the local community, was afraid of Shirley, who had acquired a reputation as someone not to mess with.

“I’ll be back in five years,” Brooke told her father, according to Christie Metcalf, Brooke’s aunt.

Metcalf came to talk to me in the Travelers Rest police station, a small nondescript building in the middle of town, where the less dangerous prisoners hang out around tables with the police officers. “We just knew something wasn’t right the next day” Metcalf, a blonde in her fifties, says. “But we couldn’t get the police to take it seriously.” After all, Brooke had run away from home before.”It was three weeks before the police treated it as a missing person’s case and began a search mission and by then we’d had rain so what were the dogs going to find?”

The present generation of police admits their predecessors mishandled the case. “The lieutenant…should have turned the case over to the sheriff’s office and never even taken a report. If he had done that, then homicide detectives would have been doing the interviews of the suspects and witnesses rather than patrol officers with zero experience in solving murder cases,” says Campbell.

The Hensons marriage fell apart in the wake of their daughter’s disappearance. Martin, ill with multiple sclerosis, became a recluse. For five years he believed his daughter would return.  Cathy quit her job and suffered from debilitating anxiety. When Campbell arranged for her to take a DNA blood test he had to carry her to the car.

In 2002 Christie Metcalf befriended a woman named Tammy Welch, who recommended they put up the website for Brooke. Tammy sought help from a medium, who had a vision of Brooke at the bottom of a well, with a yellow rope near by. now, every year on July 4, the family holds a vigil at the police station, reminding officers of their failure. (Brooke is the only missing person in the area that has never been found)

Detective Campbell was more than a little frustrated.

Campbell is convinced Brooke was murdered–not near Travelers Rest, but up near River Falls, a beautiful spot where young people liked to party. The person Campbell really wanted to question was Shaun Shirley, who was hauled into police custody the weekend of Brooke’s disappearance for “abusing two minors.” Shirley swiftly “got lawyered up” and had nothing to say, according to Campbell. He is now lives up nearer the mountains.

Campbell planned to re-interview another former boyfriend of Brooke’s, whom she had dated before Shirley. “There was a story she was planning to run away with him and that’s why she was killed,” Campbell says. But he died of an overdose before Campbell got to him. “It was ruled a suicide,” says Campbell.” Some people think he was killed.”

Thus last summer when Campbell got the call from New York, he was never likely to believe it. He might not have believed in retrospect how hard a slog it would be to piece together what happened to Esther.

Now he believes it unlikely the two women ever  met. “I think Esther was just looking for a new ID and came across Brooke’s story on line.”

Ironically Brooke’s biography only got pasted on the internet in 2004, thanks to the zeal of Tammy Welch, and Esther’s own story got put there too on police computers, thanks to her sister Lori’s bad dreams..

Tragically Brooke Henson’s family were euphoric when they first heard she had been found. “We believed it because her father had said she would be back [after five years], because she had said that what she was going to do,” says her aunt, Christy Metcalf.; then the family learned there was an impostor our there pretending to be her.

“It was the most devastating feeling” says Metcalf’s friend, Tammy Welch.

A new detective took over the Brooke Henson investigation, following the promotion of Det. Jon Campbell from the local station to the state’s SLED. Campbell said he would help out where he could.

The limelight gave the local police an incentive to retrace old steps, re-interview everyone — and to rebuild fences with the community. “We are hoping with this attention we can find out what happened Brooke,” says Christy Metcalf, adding the family would like to talk to Esther Reed to discover what she knows, if anything, about Brooke Henson. At the time of this writing, no meeting took place.

Esther Reed’s family were relieved to learn that she was alive — their last communication with her had been a typed letter from Oklahoma City in 2002, which they had feared was sent from someone else — but they were concerned.

The federal Secret Service sent its data on Reed, to the South Carolina District Attorney who could then issue a federal arrest warrant.

In February 2007 there was a report Reed had been seen in a restaurant in San Francisco. Edna Strom did not believe it. “Whatever she has gotten herself into, I just want her  to turn herself in,” she says over breakfast in a hotel in Portland, Oregon. “She’s at the point when she knows she will have to pay for whatever she’s done, but she can still get her life back… start over.”

Over on the other coast, Jon Campbell was more cynical. “This girl knows what to do, how to do it, and she will already be several steps ahead of the authorities,” he says.

The slow pace of the investigation had driven him a little crazy. This is a man, after all, who took his wife to the spy museum in Washington DC on their honeymoon. He admitted that, despite the better pay, he was sad to have been promoted off the case. But he was confident that authorities would eventually find Reed. “Yeah” he says coolly. “I think so. Eventually.”

He was right. Last January, Reed, was picked up outside Chicago. This time she surrendered willingly. Did she have regrets? Would she do it again. “I wasn’t say I was tired of running “from the law” she told officers.

But as of now, the law is done with her. V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook

The Brightest and Best (Males) Are the Ones Being Laid Off

Another day, another one bites the dust. Friends everywhere are losing their jobs.

They’re bright. The New York Times described the growing ranks of the city’s unemployed as the new chic club in town. In part, this is because the people who are losing their jobs are the best and ergo the most expensive talent around. I have been bewildered to see some of the cleverest people I know go down, while five goons get left sitting in their office chairs.

They’re also mostly male. A study last week claimed that one result of the massive job cuts was that for the first time ever, women are poised to surpass men on America’s payrolls: 82 per cent of the cuts have been men.

For those left in work, the cuts seem illogical. A really busy, productive photographer friend tells me he got an email from a bureaucrat’s young female assistant asking him to account for every paper clip, pencil and battery in his desk — with suggestions of cheaper places to buy them. Why, thought my friend, didn’t they just cut the cost of the assistant, if she had time on her hands to add up how many paper clips he was using?

But cost-cutting bureaucrats are not thinking in these panic-stricken times. In one large media company the interns — rich 21-year-old inheritors with zero experience — have taken over.

Fortunately some managements have not entirely lost their heads. At JP Morgan Chase, associates are being promoted to vice presidents — but without any pay rise. The promotion is a signal you’re wanted to stay on. The signal that you’re not is what’s called a “message bonus” — that is, a bonus of zero.

Meanwhile, various IT companies and hedge funds have told employees to make a collective decision: take a pay cut or some of you will be fired. Hearteningly, people are taking the pay cut.

And that’s the interesting thing about these times: we see who people really are. For the most part, the collective anxiety has brought out the best in people. I’ve never been prouder of the friends who’ve stoically accepted the axe but have kept their ideas flowing and their sense of humor — even as they hunt for work in places where the sign “nothing available” hangs metaphorically above the door.

This article was originally published by the London Evening Standard