Heretical But True: The Very Polite are Not Digital

Today’s front page of the New York Times has the story that two cornerstone books on “etiquette” (What is that? some younger readers might be asking) have been updated or adapted for the Digital Age. In part this is because both were published many years ago when the word “tweet” referred to a sound only birds made.

Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and Influence People was written 75 years ago and Emily Post’s Etiquette: Manners for a Modern World was first published in 1922 and has been revised since by her heirs.

Now Post has an updated edition, the first since 2004, and Dale Carnegie’s tome has been adapted — clumsily says the Times — and rebranded How to Win Friends and Influence People in the Digital Age.

Both are panned in the Times, rightfully so. Do we really need to be told not to behave like Tiger Woods off the golf course (Carnegie)? Post tells us not to light up our phones in theaters blinding our neighbors, think about what we say in corporate email and so forth. Pretty run-of-the-mill stuff.

But the truth is actually more simple than any of this: if you want to be really polite, don’t be digital.

This might sound like heresy — but it’s true. When you interact with someone one-on-one, the last thing they want to see is your cell phone, tablet or computer. They want to know they have your attention. Nothing is more irritating than arriving to dinner — or even to a business meeting — and finding your companion has his phones spread across the table. He is clearly transmitting a signal of self-importance that misfires badly. The more phones he has, the greater you know his insecurity to be.

If it’s a date then personally I cross off this person as a candidate for sex immediately. Who knows, his phones might trill mid-act and that’s just really rude. Of more immediate concern: if he’s that busy that he needs to use the phones, then he doesn’t have time for dinner and it would have been more polite to cancel.

Second: Facebook. The truly elegant are not on Facebook. This might sound like heresy coming from a blogger for a website who has not one but two Facebook accounts — but who said I was elegant?

There is a dying breed among us who have a long-held belief that the only publicity you want is when you are born and when you die and there are some — interestingly, often the most successful of my acquaintances — who shudder at the idea of Facebook. If they want to show photos of themselves to their friends they do so in private and when it comes to their birthday, well, they rely on the hope (perhaps vain) that people close to them will remember without an electronic nudge. The last thing they want is 100 felicitations from people they barely know.

Then there’s the issue of tweeting. One friend emailed me yesterday that he was gripped by the endless tweets of a man in his forties who was having the first live mid-life crisis via Twitter that he’d ever read. His tweets went something like this: “was just at a party for Jay-z; please see my cute daughter’s bday party; here’s me with Tinsley Mortimer; now I’m interested in Syria.” They are completely ADD — and bewildering. We are all left scratching our heads wondering what he’s doing. “Does he realize he’s having a public melt-down minute-by-minute?” one person articulated to me.

The point is, tweeting about how you feel, who you met, where you’ve just been, is way too much information, even for your friends. It also gives the impression that you are a frivolous person with absolutely nothing else to do.

So all you manic tweeters, try this: If you haven’t thought of your phone or tablet or computer as a gun that killed someone every time you tweeted, then please do so and pause. Because right now as you push send more and more tweet recipients are dying — of boredom at what they are reading.

As for email? Just remember that words come cheap and they are cheaper still when typed fast.
I once asked the brother of a self-made tycoon what would he like as a housegift. The answer: “a handwritten thank you letter.”

“No one” says the brother, “writes those any more.”

Peter G. Peterson, the former Chairman of The Blackstone Group, built a career on carefully written notes on beautiful stationery. The gesture made him memorable; he stood out. He’d stand out even more now — when all anyone does to say thank you following a meeting of business lunch is to shoot off a one word email: “thanks.”

Everyone who aspires to to the American dream should pause and think about that.V

Frustration of Justice – Here and in Italy

Like many others I was gripped by the newscasts yesterday in the build-up to Amanda Knox’s release from prison after four years — which blissfully for the TV networks was delayed by almost two hours leaving plenty of time of suspenseful “filler”.

The story had all the drama of a Shakespearean play. There was the “villain” — a strange macabre prosecutor, Giuliano Mignini, who had a less than illustrious reputation and refused to let the first defense team look at the DNA evidence: a bra and a kitchen knife, the supposed murder weapon it based its victory on; then there was a beautiful heroine in Knox, now 24, who was either a witch or a martyred angel depending on if you thought she’d been party to a murder — and, really, who knew? Next came the Romeo/Juliet love story: Knox’s new relationship with an Italian computer engineering student, Raffaele Sollecito, 27, who seemed to come from a decent background and who looked far too clean shaven and preppy to have been involved in the alleged orgy that took place…

And then last but not at all least poor dead Meredith Kercher, the 21-year-old British woman, whose only apparent crime in all this was to say that her new roommate, Knox, then 20, didn’t like doing the washing up… and who was found naked, raped with nearly 40 stab wounds four years ago in the room she shared with Knox in Perugia, Italy. Why was she murdered? It was originally claimed a sex game had gone seriously wrong.

“What do you think will happen?” I asked a friend, a New York lawyer whose been involved in what he calls “pretty odd” criminal cases here as I watched the build-up to the verdict in Knox’s appeals trial. “She’ll get off — whatever the truth is,” he predicted correctly. “Truth has nothing to do with this. The law has everything to do with it. And Knox was tried incorrectly the first time around. The DNA evidence was contaminated, it doesn’t add up. If justice prevails she will go free….”

Well, justice did prevail — but I think we’d be inhuman not to feel desperately sorry for the Kercher family who still wonder, appalled, what on earth happened to their kind, dead daughter on that terrible night.

It all reminded me of another case where terrible sordid events happened — and we will likely never know the truth — and this one is far closer to home than Perugia, Italy.

Dominique Strauss-Kahn — or DSK — the former disgraced head of the International Monetary Fund was accused on May 14 this year of raping Nafissatou Diallo, 32, from Guinea in a hotel room at the Sofitel hotel in New York. The office of Cyrus Vance Jr, the New York District Attorney was in charge of the prosecution, which claimed at first that DSK had appeared naked and, according to her “charged” at Diallo, who had come to clean the room thinking it was empty. She claimed he made her perform oral sex — and the end result was his semen was all over the floor and her clothes; her injuries hospitalized her — and yet he told police when they boarded the AirFrance plane on which he planned to leave the country a few hours later “nothing happened.”

According to someone who used to work in the DA’s office before Vance took office there, these words alone should have given Diallo’s suit credibility. If “nothing happened” why was his semen all over the floor? But then, days later, Diallo’s credibility fell apart, amid reports she was an illegal immigrant who had lied on tax forms, she had left the room after the alleged rape to clean two others before reporting it, and that she had a phone call with a man in jail in which she talked about extorting DSK, having now realized who he was and that he was rich.
So on August 23 DSK walked free, because Vance knew he did not have a case he could prove “beyond reasonable doubt”.

But the story goes on, like Knox’s did.

Now Diallo is suing DSK for damages in a civil case where there is no need to prove anything “beyond reasonable doubt” — just enough to look like you are telling the truth. Her American lawyers are confident they will prevail; they say that they can prove with taped conversations that Diallo never planned to extort DSK in any phone call — what she actually said was that he was a “powerful, big man”… and she knew what to do (as in hire a lawyer)… well, duh. They also say they can prove that her cleaning cart never left his hotel room. She did not clean two more rooms before reporting the alleged attack.

So what actually happened? I asked someone close to both the criminal and civil case.

The answer, I was told, was that Cyrus Vance Jr. completely messed up his prosecution. “He put junior people on the case — don’t ask me why,” says one seasoned lawyer, trying not to sound too weary about the whole thing.

Therefore if this plays out as everyone expects and DSK does not get away with his ludicrous plea for diplomatic immunity (he wasn’t here on diplomatic business and America doesn’t have a treaty like that with the IMF) he will pay a large sum to settle out of court with Diallo. The last thing I suspect he wants is a public trial. He has enough on his hands back home in Paris, with Tristane Banon the young French journalist coming out next week with a book “le Bal des hypocrites” that claims he tried to rape her in Paris in 2003.

But even if Diallo gets millions for her ordeal, the truth of what actually happened in that hotel room will still not be known. And that is the one thing I find maddening about the justice system whether it’s here or in Perugia, Italy. At least with Shakespeare, you find out what the real story is. V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook

What Really Happened With Yahoo and Carol Bartz

At first I was horrified when I read what happened to Yahoo’s former CEO Carol Bartz. A phone dump? Like I think, most people, male and female, when I read the bare bones of the story — that out of the blue she’d been called by the chairman of the board Roy Bostock and given her marching orders — on the telephone — that after two and a half years in the seat she had to go — albeit with a $10 million payoff — I was appalled. Such behavior is not generally deemed okay in the dating world. A phone dump shows an appalling lack of respect for the person being dumped. In the dating world, people who do this are generally subsequently given a wide berth.

Thus, I’d never even heard of such behavior in the corporate world. And nor, as I canvassed other CEOS, had they.

“Maybe if the CEO had been arrested and was in jail for child abuse I’d do it, but only then,” said one chairman of a board with a business with a market capital of several billion dollars.
But today Financial Times columnist Lucy Kellaway says that Bartz’s subsequent overreaction to the manner of her firing is a grave mistake.

No axed CEO, says Kellaway, especially one with a vast payoff, ought to give an interview as Bartz did to Fortune magazine and call Yahoo’s former board members “doofuses,” or swear: “they fucked me,” or go on and on about the crassness of the phone dump, thereby distracting from the main point — which is that she hadn’t lived up the expectations of her shareholders and had to go. Former CEOs are supposed to shut up, smile and head for the golf course… or back to work in another company, if they don’t blow themselves up in the press first…

Kellaway says that given Bartz’s anger, Bostock did her a favor by not firing her in person — lawyer standing next to him.

Well, I think that’s not fair to Bartz — and here’s why.

A few phone calls to people in the know at Yahoo reveal the following: No one intended to fire Bartz over the phone.

The problem was that she was due to speak at a Citigroup meeting on September 7th; the Yahoo board had belatedly reached its decision to fire her and felt they must do so before this important speech to influential analysts. So, they waited for her return from abroad. And waited. And waited. Enter rain squalls — and on September 6th Bartz’s flight kept being delayed.

Hence the dramatic phone call from Bostock, which obviously stunned Bartz, who was, no doubt, at the time going over the finer points of her speech for the next day. So the real point is not that Bartz overreacted (she may have, but, clearly, she was taken by complete surprise which is in itself revealing about the cowardice of the board).

The bigger point is the board should have fired her months ago.

This is the pertinent point made in the outraged letter to the board by Daniel Loeb, the CEO of the hedgefund ThirdPoint which has a 5.15 per cent stake in Yahoo.

He calls for a new board.

Why?

Loeb writes among other things that the board should have reacted months ago to the obvious: Bartz’s lack of experience in the space and complete unsuitability for the job which has dragged the company’s stock price down to approximately $13.61 a share when he reckons it should be a round $20. Then there was what he calls her “alienation of Asian partners” and a terrible lack of communication skills (which I must confess I agree with, having watched a recent interview done with her on YouTube).

Yet as recently as June 23 the board was backing her publicly. “We believe in Carol” Bostock said.

Was he blind, deaf and dumb?

Loeb’s letter says it all: If the board had done its job months ago, then all this controversy about the etiquette of a firing phone call — which is worthy of commentary and analyzing, and hopefully will never happen again — would be completely moot. V

Today’s Headlines About the Arrest of Lehman’s Former Chief Operating Officer’s for Prescription Forging Have a Crucial Message for all Wall Street Firms

So today my phone has rung off the hook.

Why?

The New York Times Dealbook broke the news that Lehman Brothers former COO Bradley (Brad) Jack, who owns the most expensive home in Fairfield, CT, worth $34.6 million was “charged with second-degree forgery and forgery of a prescription drug.”

If he is convicted, he faces jail time, which would make him the first Lehman senior executive to don a jump suit.

On one level this is a huge irony, since as I wrote in my 2010 book, The Devil’s Casino: Friendship, Betrayal and the High Stakes Inside Lehman Brothers (John F. Wiley & Sons) — despite massive unethical and irresponsible business practices, appalling management and board oversight, as well as highly questionable earnings results in 2008 — no one from the erstwhile Lehman Brothers is yet anywhere close to being headed to the Big House.

Bradley Jack could not be held responsible for any of the above since, as I wrote in my book, he was forced out of the firm in 2004 by the Machiavellian man wanting to become the firm’s president (number two): Joe Gregory.

And if anyone wants to blame a single person for Lehman’s demise — well, in my view, after Fuld, it is Joe Gregory who promoted all the wrong people (loyalists to him, rather than competent financiers), punished dissent with backstabbing and was more interested in telling everyone about his lavish lifestyle than managing the firm.

In 2004 Gregory got rid of Jack who was his competitor for the job of President — unfilled since 1997. How did Gregory do this? He told Dick Fuld, the CEO that Jack was allegedly abusing prescription drugs. (Jack had suffered cancer and had a scar right across his torso). I asked Jack about the allegations at the time I was reporting the book and he denied them. But he did talk to me about Gregory’s very “unsympathetic” attitude towards his recuperation, which only made it harder for him to get better. He felt he had to watch his back every second. He knew Gregory was out to “get” him — as did his then-wife Karin, who complained bitterly of the conniving of Gregory’s wife, Nikki. Nikki, she claimed deliberately left her out of an antiquing trip with Kathy Fuld at the Fuld’s home in Sun Valley (Nikki Gregory never commented on this but both Jacks corroborated the story — as did others).

So today’s news that Jack allegedly handed in a fake prescription for 12 Oxycontin pill and nine Ritalin pills at a CVS in Fairfield has not shocked me or the ex-Lehmanites.

But personally I feel sorry for Jack. I left him a sympathetic message along with his ex-wife Karin who provided some of the more blood-curdling material in my book about the tough Orwellian Lehman culture. It was Karin Jack who explained that Lehman wives were expected to give birth on their own, move house on their own — and in one especially grim scenario leave a very sick child’s bedside in order to get on a helicopter to visit a new mcMansion purchased by….Joe Gregory. The senior executives’ lives were subordinated — not for the business — but to pay lip-service to a vain greedy man.

So there are two lessons here.

Had Brad Jack worked for a culture that supported rather than culled illness, maybe we would not be reading today’s headlines. They are a brutal reminder of what a truly horrible place Lehman became, ruining the reputation of what had once been a place of dreams.

But more importantly they illustrate the importance of a firm’s culture. If Lehman’s culture had cultivated dissenting opinions, been more tolerant of illness in capable people, and less about men terrified of losing their corner suites — then they would not have fallen — and more broadly, of course, they would not have caused a worldwide catastrophe which doesn’t seem to be getting much better three years on. All Wall Street firms would be wise to think about this.

V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook

Former Lehman COO Arrested for Forging Oxycontin and Ritalin Prescriptions

So today my phone has rung off the hook.

Why?

The Fairfield Patch, broke the news on Monday that Lehman Brothers’ former COO Bradley (Brad) Jack — who owns the most expensive home in Fairfield, CT, worth $34.6 million — had been arrested and was “charged with second-degree forgery and forgery of a prescription drug.”

The New York Times‘ Dealbook pointed out that if he is convicted, he faces jail time, which would make him the first Lehman senior executive to don a jump suit.

On one level this is a huge irony, since as I wrote in my 2010 book, The Devil’s Casino: Friendship, Betrayal and the High Stakes Inside Lehman Brothers (John F. Wiley & Sons) — despite massive unethical and irresponsible business practices, appalling management and board oversight, as well as highly questionable earnings results in 2008 — no one from the erstwhile Lehman Brothers is yet anywhere close to being headed to the Big House.

Bradley Jack could not be held responsible for any of the above since, as I wrote in my book, he was forced out of the firm in 2005 by the infamously Machiavellian man wanting to become the firm’s president (number two): Joe Gregory. (In my book I quote the in-house Lehman motto “You never want to be told you are doing well by Joe.” It’s code for “you are fired.” Hence his nicknames were “Uncle Joe” after Stalin and “Darth Vader”).

And if anyone wants to blame a single person for Lehman’s demise — well, in my view, after Fuld, it is Joe Gregory who promoted all the wrong people (loyalists to him, rather than competent financiers), punished dissent with backstabbing and was more interested in telling everyone about his lavish lifestyle than managing the firm.

In 2004 Gregory got rid of Jack who was his competitor for the job of president — unfilled since 1997. How did Gregory do this? I happen to know from several sources that he told Dick Fuld, the CEO that Jack was allegedly abusing prescription drugs and as I state in my book “not sufficiently focused on work”. This is of course a euphemism.

The truth is that Jack, by his own admission to me, had suffered cancer and had a scar right across his torso. I asked Jack about the drug addictionallegations at the time I was reporting the book and he denied them. But he did talk to me about Gregory’s very “unsympathetic” attitude towards his recuperation, which only made it harder for him to get better. Jack felt pressured to return to work far sooner than the doctors told him he should. But he felt he had no choice.
He felt he had to watch his back every second. He knew, he told me, that Gregory was out to “get” him — as did his then-wife Karin, who complained bitterly to me of what she saw as the conniving of Gregory’s wife, Nikki. Nikki, Karin claimed, deliberately left her out of an antiquing trip with Kathy Fuld at the Fuld’s home in Sun Valley (Nikki Gregory never commented on this but both Jacks corroborated the story — as did others).

So today’s news that Jack allegedly handed in a fake prescription for 12 Oxycontin pills and nine Ritalin pills at a CVS in Fairfield has not shocked me or the ex-Lehmanites. Some seem to be much more interested in this news than the the other story about Lehman: that the world’s largest bankruptcy is drawing to a conclusion.

But personally I feel sorry for Jack. I left him a sympathetic message along with his ex-wife Karin who provided some of the more blood-curdling material in my book about the tough Orwellian Lehman culture. It was Karin Jack who explained that Lehman wives were expected to give birth on their own, move house on their own — and in one especially grim scenario leave a very sick child’s bedside in order to get on a helicopter to visit a new mcMansion purchased by… Joe Gregory. The senior executives’ lives were subordinated — not for the business — but to pay lipservice to a vain greedy man. In my book — and in Vanity Fair — we ran a picture of Nikki Gregory’s vast shoe closet — the size of a room — and guests to the house in Huntingdon, Long Island were actually given tours. The screen version of Too Big To Fail opens with Gregory getting out of his beloved helicopter in which he commuted to work.

So there are two lessons here.

Had Brad Jack worked for a culture that supported rather than culled illness, maybe we would not be reading today’s headlines.

They are a brutal reminder of what a truly horrible place Lehman became, ruining the reputation of what had once been a place of dreams.

But more importantly they illustrate the importance of a firm’s culture. If Lehman’s culture had cultivated dissenting opinions, been more tolerant of illness in capable people, and less about men terrified of losing their corner suites — then they would not have fallen — and more broadly, of course, they would not have caused a worldwide catastrophe which doesn’t seem to be getting much better three years on. All Wall Street firms would be wise to think about this.

Vicky Ward is a Contributing Editor to Vanity Fair

The Whirligig of Time Fails to Bring Its Revenges

A year ago, while Washington was grandstanding about the about lazy, unethical, risky banking practices that put the entire country at risk — I published a book. It was called The Devil’s Casino: Friendship, Betrayal and the High Stakes Played Inside Lehman Brothers, and it chronicled, among other things, the lazy, unethical, risky banking practices that had put the entire country at risk in 2008.

At the time, the D.C. hearings and S.E.C. investigations were underway, and Washingtonians swore that they’d clean up the mess and regulate the hell out of Wall Street — and that greed would be a thing of the past.

I expressed my skepticism at the time. “The crisis will happen again,” I said. “Not tomorrow, and not in the same way — but you cannot regulate greed.” That, really, was the central theme of the book, which looked at the evolution of Wall Street through the narrow lens of Lehman Brothers, spanning fifty years.

Fast forward to today, when my book comes out in paperback. Let’s take a look at the headlines:

Alan Greenspan has just declared that Dodd-Frank reform legislation is a waste of time for the reasons listed above. The financial system is so “irredeemably opaque,” he wrote in the Financial Times, that policymakers cannot hope to sort it out. Barney Frank (D. Mass), the former chairman of the House Financial Services Committee naturally disagrees. In the Financial Times, he mumbles on about the effectiveness of stress tests. But didn’t it take most U.S. banks about thirty seconds to pass those in the wake of TALF?

Mr. Greenspan has a point.

But, forget opacity — let’s just look at the simple stuff.

Bernie Madoff — in jail for perpetrating the biggest Ponzi scheme ever — has declared that it was no surprise that J.P. Morgan stands accused of reaping $6.4 billion in funds from the scheme. The bank denied this, but Madoff said the bank “must have known.” In other words, when given the opportunity to make money in dubious circumstances — people take the money.

President Obama has ended his open war with Wall Street, making nice with the Chamber Of Commerce and promising that he will find ways to work with them, not against them. Why has he taken this unprecedented action? Could it be because he has realized that if employment does not rise and the economy is still faltering, he might not be re-elected in 2012?

Lloyd Blankfein, the CEO of Wall Street’s favorite punching bag, Goldman Sachs, has just received a bonus of $18 million at the same time that one of his outside directors, Raj Gupta, the former CEO of McKinsey, is testifying that he gave inside information from Goldman board meetings to Raj Ratnaram, the CEO of hedge fund Galleon.

And what about Warren Buffett, considered for most of his 80 years the only straightshooter in the world of finance, and a crucial player in saving the world economy (well, Goldman Sachs) in 2008? Turns out he might not be quite so straightforward. His image is tarnished amid accusations that he acquired the chemicals company Lubrizol when he knew that his second-in-command and heir-apparent, Jeffrey Sokol, since let go, had just bought $10 million shares of the firm.

On Friday, Wall Street Journal readers were treated to this great headline: “Subprime Bonds Are Back“. Whoopee! The very things that led Americans to treat their houses as ATMs are having a resurgence.

And on Monday, we learned that the Fed and US Treasury are engaged in a war with the FDIC over how many companies should be branded too big to fail. The Fed and US Treasury want less than ten; the FDIC wants three to four times that number. The moral of this is: Greenspan is right. It’s all too complex for anyone to sort it out.

Meanwhile has anything happened to the housing Government Sponsored Entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which blew up the weekend before Lehman did?

Yes: according to a front page article in Friday’s New York Times. Although neither Fannie or Freddie has yet been reformed (that’s on next year’s agenda, apparently), their top six executives received over $35.4 million since their collapse in 2008. That’s an awful lot of money for doing-well, nothing.

And all those dreadful losses reported to be happening in the hedge fund industry, swirling with rumors about insider trading after the closure of David Ganek’s Level Global and three other hedge funds in the wake of FBI raids? Well, it turns out that hedge funds, while not outperforming the market, are still profitable — thanks to those lovely fees.

Greed never dies; rules are made to be bent; the rich are indeed different from the rest of us — and Shakespeare’s fool was wrong. It would seem the whirligig of time does not, alas, bring its revenges.

Vicky Ward is a contributing editor to Vanity Fair and the author the New York Times Bestseller: The Devil’s Casino, Friendship, Betrayal and the High-Stakes Games Played Inside Lehman Brothers (John F. Wiley & Sons).

 

Goldstein on Gelt and an Announcement

Here’s what we talked about on Goldstein on Gelt -which will air next Monday noon EST: Did new media and the democratization of news make it easier for women to rise in media? Is there a  bias in covering women in the media? And really the big question – which is why men are so short-term in their thinking when it comes to hiring great women – who may want to take a few years out to have kids – but who are a great long term investment?

I will be blogging from the Women in the World 2011 conference this Thursday – Saturday. Fascinating line up of guests, great panelists and moderators – and you have to love the fact that the inaugural dinner on Thursday night kicks off with Bill Clinton – and all us women!!! Standby! V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook

Death Threat Warning

Dear All, For the second time in my career I am receiving death threats from people who are afraid of what I might write. For the second time I will not be cowed. People who send me emails saying “Those who have money know how to hurt you” do not scare me. These bullies should know that if anything happens to me or my family the authorities know exactly what to do and where to look. And I trust that anyone who knows what I am talking about here – will help them. V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook

The Storming of St. Barth’s

image

On St. Barth’s, the chic-est Caribbean island, Christmas and New Year’s are the mad season. “During Christmas the energy is incredible,” says a longtime resident, who describes the island then as a “summer camp for wealthy, well-known New Yorkers,” business tycoons, music stars, and Hollywood celebrities. “It’s like the whole island is Studio 54 at its peak.”

There are so many rental cars on the roads that the traffic crawls. All the hotels are full. So, too, are the rental villas, which go for as much as $150,000 a week during the holiday season.

The most recent wave of invaders is the “New Russian” super-rich, and the island’s biggest celebrity at the moment is billionaire investor Roman Abramovich, who last spring renovated the local soccer stadium as a gift to the island. He paid $89 million for a 70-acre estate above Gouverneur Beach, which he visits with his 29-year-old girlfriend, Dasha Zhukova, and he can be seen tooling around in his Mini Cooper without the bodyguards that usually accompany him in London.

On New Year’s Eve, parties are given all over the island and on the yachts moored in Gustavia Harbor. “The tradition is if you know the friend of the friend of the friend you’re in,” says the longtime resident. Party crashing is an accepted local pastime. Last year Abramovich’s party was the party to crash. If you managed to get in, you could mingle with the invited guests, including Gwen Stefani and Beyoncé—who both reportedly performed—Jay-Z, Orlando Bloom, Miranda Kerr, and Lindsay Lohan.

When you got bored there, according to the resident, “you could always go to the party aboard [Microsoft co-founder] Paul Allen’s boat [the 416-foot Octopus], because it’s so huge that he literally just sends shuttles [to shore], and anybody can come.”

The regular holiday crowd includes Revlon chairman Ronald Perelman and modern-art collector Peter Brant and his newly reconciled wife, Stephanie Seymour. Some wealthy visitors like the island so much they have bought homes there—for instance, art dealer Larry Gagosian, Jimmy Buffett, Steve Martin, photographer Patrick Demarchelier, David Letterman, and legendary French singer Johnny Hallyday, who sometimes performs spontaneously at parties, just as Mikhail Baryshnikov sometimes sweeps a pretty girl off her feet on the dance floor.

Billy Joel used to try out songs there, and Steve Martin spent several visits hiding behind shades and hats—before he realized nobody cared. That is the unique ambience of St. Barth’s. “There has never been a them-and-us” attitude, says a longtime resident.

On one level he is right. The locals have few problems with the visiting celebrities.

The divisions they face are among themselves, above all between the “Metros” and the old St. Barth’s families who own most of the island’s land and businesses and control its politics.

“Les métros are the people who come from la métropole, meaning from France,” explains David Zara, the vice president of Tradewind Aviation, which shuttles passengers between St. Barth’s and Puerto Rico in the winter. “There is a lot of tension between the Metros and the St. Barth’s [locals]—it’s all very well hidden because of the tourism, but, trust me, they hate each other.”

In general, the 10 or so old, powerful St. Barth’s families, led by Bruno Magras, the president of the 19-person Territorial Council (the local legislature), favor building and development—because they stand to profit most from it—while those who come to the island for pleasure and relaxation are for preserving its low-density housing and natural beauty. “Bruno is from the generation that feels that development must be endless,” says Maxime Desouches, an opposition member on the Territorial Council, “and that’s the way to go, because if you don’t have any development the island will fall back, and it will lose everything.”

The development/anti-development debate exploded after the July 16, 2009, meeting of the council, at which President Magras announced he had been approached by the American hotelier André Balazs, 53, the suave, handsome proprietor of L.A.’s Chateau Marmont and New York’s Mercer and Standard hotels, about building a 40-bungalow “eco-resort” behind the dunes at Saline Beach. Saline is a “green zone” (meaning you can’t build on it) and an iconic spot—one of only three mostly undeveloped beaches left on the island and the most pristine of them.

As the proposal was not formally on the agenda, no vote was taken that evening, but, according to Desouches and others, in the weeks that followed Magras let it be known that he strongly favored the project. (Magras says in an e-mail, “I was not against the idea of opening a part of that area behind the dune.”) And while Desouches says the majority of the council members were not initially enthusiastic, it was generally believed that the president could easily persuade them to vote for it. As one resident observes, “It is a local joke that if there is a voting session the first one who is going to vote yes or no is Bruno. He will put his hand up first before everybody else, and then everybody votes the same way.” Jean-Pierre Hennequet, who owns an arts and antiques gallery in Gustavia, the island’s capital, says that council meetings often approach farce: “You should see them. They arrive, they have a list of what they have to vote on, and they discover the documents when they arrive—hundreds of pages—and they have to say yes or no.”

By early October, three local environmental groups—Saint Barth Environment, Essential Saint Barth, and the Association for the Protection of Birds—had collected 1,185 signatures, from the approximately 5,000 eligible voters on the island, to block the Saline project. The petition, many residents believe, is the first significant challenge to Bruno Magras, who has ruled St. Barth’s for 15 years, first as mayor, when the island was a commune of Guadeloupe, an overseas region of France, and then as president since July 2007, shortly after the island became a more independent “overseas collectivity.”“It was the first time there was a petition, a public petition, against Bruno’s proposal with a lot of signatures,” says Hennequet.

The issue of developing Saline has galvanized the inhabitants of St. Barth’s and ballooned into the broader issue of the future of this tropical paradise: will it be paved and built over into oblivion, thereby alienating the wealthy and famous visitors who are drawn to it each winter and who fund much of the local economy?

Hélène Bernier, a key player in circulating the petition, doesn’t look like much of a challenge to anyone, certainly not to powerful politicians and wealthy developers. At the Eden Rock, the first and most famous hotel on the island, she stands out from the other lunchers—French, American, and English tourists decked out in Eres, Chanel, Vilebrequin, and similar beach uniforms, who can still, in these hard times, blithely afford $100 for a vegetable plate and a half-bottle of rosé wine.

Bernier, who is slight—perhaps five feet two—says her family has been on St. Barth’s for 10 generations, but it is a small and poor family, not a powerful one. Today she is wearing khaki shorts and a white T-shirt that has seen better days. Her brown shoulder-length hair is damp from the humidity of the lunchtime heat. She looks absurdly young. Is she in her 20s? “I am 36,” she says.

Bernier explains that many more people supported the petition than actually signed. “I went house by house and said, ‘Do you want to sign?’ And a lot of people said, ‘I don’t want a hotel on Saline, but if I put my name on the paper, I’m going to have something I need from the president, for me or my family, and he is going to say no. So I cannot help you.’ It was a surprise for me at first. I said, ‘You can say what you want. You can put your name here—it’s legal. You can do it.’ But they would still say, ‘I don’t want to, because if I ask for something for myself after I sign, they are not going to give it to me.’ ”

Bernier herself has a vested interest in seeing that Saline is not developed: over the last eight years she has built up a business, Easy Time, in which she takes tourists hiking to visit the island’s places of natural beauty and cultural heritage. One of her clients’ favorite places is the beach at Saline, but she now fears for her and their safety if she takes them there.

The owners of the land which Balazs wants to develop—and there are dozens of them, largely from the Lédée and Bryan families—are mightily angered by her for ruining their jackpot. Because of Balazs’s interest, the owners were hoping to revoke the area’s green-zone status, which would make the land much more valuable. As Desouches notes, “When you consider the obscene amount of money involved, those people who want to sell their land don’t look kindly on someone who is saying, ‘No, no, this is not a good idea.’ ” Another longtime resident observes, “The Saline landowners are very cross, and now they are putting signs behind the beach that say, private property.”

“[I] took an ad in the local newspaper,” Bernier recalls, “in which I said on a certain day I would lead a hiking tour on Saline. The day before [a person from one of the families who own land there] called me and said, ‘If you come on Saline, we’ll be waiting for you with some rocks and we won’t let you pass. I don’t want you anymore in Saline.’ And that day I did go with my client to Saline. They were there. I saw them, but they didn’t move.”
Our Dinner with André

According to Desouches, Balazs, after talking with Magras and perhaps getting assurances from him, bought 50 percent of the land through “co-ownership”—which Balazs likens to buying shares in a corporation—at a cost of 15 million euros ($21 million), and he planned to buy the rest once he had all the building permits and authorizations. After hearing of the petition to stop his project, he made available on a Web site what look to be PowerPoint presentations about it. They are filled with photos of birds and plants and dunes, and they talk about the many environmental improvements Balazs says he will make to the property, such as “dune stability and enhancement,” “stormwater control,” “habitat restoration,” and re-vegetating with “lush native species.” Beyond some tiny rectangles on one or two of the aerial photos, a computer mock-up of eight generic cottages in a circle, and a stock photo of a bungalow from another resort, there is no indication of what the eco-resort will actually look like, although it is stated that the bungalows will not be visible from the beach, will utilize green technology, and will occupy only 2 to 5 percent of the parcel. However, this 2 to 5 percent seems to be only the total area the bungalow foundations will occupy, rather than the area throughout which they will be scattered. There is no mention of any office, restaurant, or common buildings. (Balazs explains that the 2-to-5-percent figure is a mere approximation.)

On September 25, 2009, Balazs went down to St. Barth’s with three or four of his team, including “a lawyer, a planner, and an ecologist,” to present the project at a meeting attended by 40 or so members of the local populace. The presentation was as vague and ecological as the documents: “You see nature from when you were a child, and when you were a child you see something green and that’s the way you think it was always supposed to be. But you know humans have been living … here for many centuries It’s nature with everything that’s alive—we’re nature It becomes fairly complicated and I’d be happy to talk about the details when we have more time.”

The mood was raucous and confrontational. “Not in this place,” one member of the crowd heckled, referring to Saline.

After talking a lot about how eco-resorts were the wave of the future, the Balazs team was forced to admit that they had never actually built one among their seven hotels. As Jean-Jacques Rigaud, the editor of Tropical magazine, put it, “The project was in a really very sensitive area, and he had to come with very serious guys in this field to be convincing enough, and he didn’t do that at all.”

Maxime Desouches recalls, “They were asking all kinds of questions, and obviously, when you build a hotel like that, you’re going to have employees, so I asked him right off, O.K., what’s the plan for you to employ local people versus bringing some more people who will drive [the] price of the rents up? So he couldn’t answer that. And I’m sure because he didn’t think down the road to see what was involved with his project in terms of local impact on the economy and how to get things to work.” (Balazs admits that he has not yet worked out such details as the design of the bungalows and who will build them. He explains that at this stage of its development the Saline project is “a vision, a plan, a suggestion,” and he believes all the objections that have been voiced are part of the normal dialogue and that each one of those concerns will be addressed at the appropriate time during the approvals process.)

The evening went only further downhill when Balazs took a small group to dinner after the presentation. According to a source whose good friend was there, “André talked about protecting some local species [of bird or spider], which was, in fact, not found on the island—which raised ‘mixed feelings’ around the table.”

Jean-Philippe Piter, 42, a photographer who edits the annual Pure Saint-Barth (which features large photographs of young, naked women—a component that exasperates the more conventional members of the local tourist board), believes Balazs’s resort will mean “more people, more cars, more trash to deal with.” Some other questions skeptics are asking: Would yachts anchor in the sea opposite the resort? Would there be a private beach entrance for residents? Would it lead to construction all around the bay?

Jean-Pierre Hennequet echoes others in suspecting an underhanded scheme. “Due to the very high land price and the high cost of construction, a new hotel cannot be made profitable on St. Barth’s,” he says, “unless it is in fact eco-bungalows presented as a ‘hotel,’ which are actually intended to be individually sold as private ‘villas,’ with hotel service. Many professionals suspect that this is the real project behind the eco-curtain window dressing.” (Balazs says that selling the bungalows individually is the kind of thing that would be determined when getting final approvals.)

Even before Balazs came on the scene, virtually all of St. Barth’s was up in arms over a high-end development company, Duet Luxury Hotel Fund, which in 2008 began building, right by the lagoon on Grand Cul-de-Sac, a 42-room hotel that was to be called the Nilaia Beach Resort & Spa. Duet, which owns stakes in the restaurant Automat, in London, and the restaurant-and-hotel company Groupe Alain Ducasse, in Monaco, stopped the project last year due to a slowdown in the luxury market. It now consists of half-built concrete shells sitting behind rusty wire fencing in what used to be one of the most beautiful places on the island. “Why could Balazs not take the Grand Cul-de-Sac project on and complete it instead of invading Saline?” many on the island wonder. (Balazs replies that the unfinished resort is completely antithetical to the one he wants to build.)

Even those in favor of the project think it should be anywhere but Saline. Anne Dentel, a villa-rental agent, says, “I love Balazs’s project. Really, I love it. I thought it was a great idea, a great hotel, but it’s not the right location for me…. André said, ‘Oh, I’m going to build on the little mountain, and I will not go on the beach.’ But you know how it works. One client would go down and say, ‘I would like a lounge chair, an umbrella.’ Then ‘I’d like something to drink.’ Then ‘I would like a sandwich,’ and, you know, blah, blah, blah.”

Maxime Desouches tried to follow up with Balazs after the presentation to persuade him to consider another site: “I went up and talked to him. I said, ‘Look, I’m a public servant here, and I understand what you’re trying to do.’ And he said, ‘O.K., well, let’s go have lunch.’ So I went to his rental house, and I said, ‘Look, your idea is wonderful, but not in Saline, not in a million years. It’s going to be very difficult for you to swing that.’ But it was just like trying to explain to a little kid that what he was doing is wrong, but he wants his way, and he will try to get it anyway. I explained to him we had some other avenues we could explore, and my role as a public servant was to try to see how we could match what he wanted to do with other sites. I told him we could work on the Manapany [an existing hotel], which is in bad need of being re-done, and we could open the construction on one side and try to swing something there. At first, he was saying, ‘No, no, no. If I can’t do it in Saline, I won’t do it anywhere.’ But then he said, ‘Can you show me on Google Maps where it is?’ So I pointed it out, and he looked at it. He gave me his card, his phone number, and all that, and I said, ‘Let’s discuss it.’ So, when I was in New York I left two or three messages for him, but he didn’t return my call.” (Balazs says he has had a good dialogue with Desouches and was intrigued by the prospect of renovating the Manapany, but he discovered it is not for sale.)
Turndown Service

‘Construction, construction everywhere,” complains Jean-Philippe Piter as we sit in his Daihatsu Terios—the car of choice on the island. “It’s time to stop the construction because we’re really now seeing the trouble that it causes for the environment: for trash, for electricity, for everything.” On an island that is barely eight square miles, we dart around, following a main road that loops from Plage de Colombier to Grand Cul-de-Sac and back. We pass through a small residential area, Pointe Milou, where Piter points out the foundation for a large house. “This is what I’m talking about. This is just too much,” he says, exasperated. Because of such construction, in the upcoming issue of Pure Saint-Barth, Piter will feature photographs of the island’s ugliness. “Whereas before I might have airbrushed out the ugly, growing construction, now it’s in. I want people to see the ugly gray rocks, the dumps, the burning waste,” he says. “Have you seen … And God Created Woman, with Brigitte Bardot?” he asks. “Remember when St. Tropez was a little village of fishermen? It was beautiful.”

Driving east to Grand Cul-de-Sac—the area where Duet Luxury Hotel Fund suspended its project—Piter recalls the site 15 years ago, when he first came to the island, as a lagoon where locals would come to swim and relax on Sunday afternoons. It is now surrounded by large homes, which, he says, have wrecked the delicate eco-system. “So now the lagoon is polluted. They fucked it up so much, you have no idea.” The skeleton of the 42-room hotel is as ugly as people say.

As we drive away, Piter spots some garbage, slams his hands on the steering wheel, and steers the car onto the soft shoulder of the road. He apologizes for his anger and excuses himself, saying, “Let me take a quick photo of this place.”

At Saline, which gets its name from the salt ponds behind the beach that once provided the locals with a source of income, we take the path from the makeshift parking lot to the beach. “You have to suffer a little bit to go there,” Piter warns me. From the car, we climb a hill, the path strewn with rocks and pebbles that will cut you if you are barefoot. Then we go over the dune, and a breathtaking view spreads out before us—an expanse of golden sand, half a mile long. Behind us are small hills brimming with palm trees, cacti, and birds. Piter’s passion for this place has never left him. “You now understand that they can’t touch it,” he says. “That would be the biggest mistake. Please tell Bruno when you see him that American people [and] tourists you speak with don’t want it.”

‘Lédée … Magras … Laplace … Gréaux … Gumbs … Questel … Turbé … Brin … Blanchard … Berry … Bernier … I think that’s it,” says Jean-Pierre Hennequet, who is listing the large and complicated founding families who rule St. Barth’s. If you check the St. Barth’s telephone book you’ll find 227 Gréaux, for instance, and 133 Lédées—on an island of 8,500 permanent residents. On the government organizational chart, which includes five officials and the 19-person Territorial Council, there are 6 people with the last name of Gréaux, 2 with Laplace, 2 with Magras, 1 with Turbé, and 1 with Questel.

I meet with Hennequet, long a sage confidant of many local inhabitants, at his shop. You walk in off the cobbled street and are hit by a cool darkness that is strange for sun-soaked St. Barth’s. Here, among the shadows, one sees a Fang Ngil mask from Africa, a 12th-century Cambodian sculpture of a young dancing girl, a piece of amber on an engraved silver pedestal from Bhutan. “It’s an eclectic collection,” Hennequet says airily, with the ease of a man who is familiar with the world’s exotic nooks and crannies.

“It all started here in the 17th century actually,” he says of St. Barth’s. “None of the founders came from France. They all came from St. Kitts, which was then half French, half English. The governor of St. Kitts sent about 60 people here in 1648 to colonize the island in the name of the French company of the West Indies. But there was nothing here, and it was lacking natural springs, so it was very difficult to settle here. And at some point it was also inhabited by the Carib Indians, who, when they met people different from themselves here, chopped off their heads.” So new settlers were enlisted from Normandy and Brittany, and they firmly established themselves around the 1670s. “Then they split the island among themselves more or less.”

The modern era of St. Barth’s started in 1938 when Rémy de Haenen, a former French merchant marine, came to the Caribbean and soon saw a ripe opportunity to establish a smuggling trade. Traveling at first by boat, de Haenen realized that to truly control the Caribbean he would need to do so by air, and, legend has it, he learned to fly—at an airstrip in Miami—in one hour. De Haenen was thus credited with being the first person to land an airplane on the island, having to first scatter the sheep by passing close overhead. By the 40s, de Haenen considered the island his home, and in 1953 he built Eden Rock on a piece of land near the airstrip that jutted out into the water. He made the house out of a green stone he dived for and a rare hardwood called Angelique that he imported from Guyana. The resulting house—and cottages he built around it—were uniquely hurricane-proof and served as the island’s first guesthouse for visitors, among them banker David Rockefeller.

As far as smugglers went, de Haenen was scarcely alone, but he was far and away the best. Until the 70s, the Caribbean was still largely an unregulated place where the smugglers were far more successful than the rare customs officials trying to stop them. In 1951, after being caught in Venezuela with 30,000 crates of whisky, according to his son Rémy and his grandson Tristan, de Haenen received what was the largest fine ever administered in the Caribbean: one billion francs. Over the course of his life, he was sentenced to prison three times, but none of this affected the high opinion the people on St. Barth’s had of him. By 1953, de Haenen was the consul general of the island, and, in 1962, he was elected mayor. Upon word of his victory, hundreds of islanders carried him in the streets. De Haenen protected and modernized the island, and, as one story goes, when France became curious about tax revenues and sent a collector to investigate, he organized a crowd of several hundred to wait at the airport with pitchforks, tar, and feathers. The tax collector never disembarked.

When de Haenen died, in 2008, his grandson says, he was “one of the poorest men on the island.” De Haenen sold his real estate at a loss, but those old-timers who managed to hold on to their land now find they are sitting on gold mines—even a modest house off the water can go for $7 to $8 million these days.

Hennequet says, as do other Metros, that the founding families fear becoming a minority of the voters and losing their power. What is at stake? “They have so many links and agreements between the big families here,” he explains, “and they have organized it so you do the petroleum and gas import. You do other general import. You do this, you do that. And they are all pulling the strings behind the scenes.” The powerful families are jokingly called the Magrafia, after their leader, President Magras. “There are so many little secrets going on on the island that they hold themselves apart,” says Randy Gurley, the owner of the restaurant Maya’s, just outside Gustavia. “If there’s a conflict between three people, and two of them are St. Barth’s, the St. Barth’s will side with each other, even if they hate each other, just because that’s how things have to go. Bruno has capitalized on that—I mean he is very much a St. Barth’s guy.”

Magras is a lightning rod for critics of the St. Barth’s system of patronage, and the stories are many about how bluntly he uses his power. People who cross him, say his opponents, find their requests for construction permits or other needed government approvals interminably delayed or denied. Or they will be harassed by the police, as Hélène Bernier claims she has been in an open letter to the island’s elected officials. Monique Magras, who is divorcing Bruno’s youngest brother, Denis, has given her “testament” about what she knows about the Magras family to her lawyer because she is so fearful of their power on the island.

One of Magras’s biggest antagonists on the island is David Zara, whose Tradewind Aviation is a rival to St. Barth Commuter, the airline owned and operated by Magras. “Should the president of an island also be its major businessman?” asks Zara, 48. “The answer is no. You have to make a choice. Either you’re a politician who wants the good of the greater community or you’re a businessman, but you can’t be both.” (Magras disagrees and says his job as president pays him only 4,800 euros a month, he has kids, and he has to make a living like everyone else.) Zara says that since Tradewind started operating on the island, in 2005, Magras has continually harassed him, accusing him of breaking regulations, and having police detain his pilots. “Bruno is a deeply envious person who cannot stand that anybody can come and make money on his island when he thinks he should be the only one making money. It’s pure, pure, pure, deep, deep envy,” says Zara.

Last year, Zara claims, a policeman even admitted to him that he had been instructed by Magras to harass him: “I mean, this man is way out there. He accuses me of everything under the sun.”

Magras responds that Zara has operated charter flights from St. Barth’s “to destinations where he was not allowed to fly to [by aviation regulations]. We did speak to Mr. Zara many times about that.” Referring to Zara’s claim about the policeman’s harassing him on orders from Magras, Magras says he did report what he thought to be an illegal charter flight to Guadeloupe one day. A few hours later his son Bertrand told him that Zara had said he was picking up friends there. “So it is true that on arrival in Guadeloupe, the gendarme made a control there And you’ll agree that when you don’t have anything to hide, being controlled is not a problem.”

Jean-Pierre Hennequet is more measured about Magras and points out the many good things he has done for St. Barth’s. “He managed to win a very large amount of autonomy from our motherland, which benefits the unique fiscal situation of the island within France—local residents who have been here for five years pay almost no taxes. He was very conservative, fiscally speaking, so probably alone among territorial entities of France we have not a cent of debt. He has developed many facilities for sports and for young people, and he is now doing the same for elderly people, and he is presently rebuilding the network of roads in a grand manner … maybe a bit too grand for the St. Barth’s some of us like.”

But Magras is also a shrewd and wily politician, Hennequet notes: “I will give you an example. From time to time there are public debates where the public can ask any questions, and he answers. If you say, ‘But why don’t you do this?’ or ‘It would be better to do it this way,’ usually he will not accept that something good can come from somebody else. It has to be his proposal. So he will reply, ‘Yes, it’s a very good idea. Of course, I thought of it first, but we cannot do it, because there is a law which in Article 6(z) says we can’t do that.’ And everyone says, ‘Oh really? That’s fine. Very well.’ Then after the meeting you go and check the law, and either the law does not exist or the article does not exist or the sub-article says something different.” (Magras says this is “nonsense.”)

Notes another longtime resident, “Bruno wants to be seen as the beneficent king. If he says there is a deal or no deal, just accept it and move on and stop talking about that silly rumor.”
One Man Is an Island

Bruno Magras, who looks a lot like the actor Charles Bronson, wears large tinted glasses, a blue dress shirt, and tan pants on the day we meet in his office. His cell phone is in his shirt pocket. His office has a big wooden desk and a photograph (mandatory for all French subsections) of French president Nicolas Sarkozy on the wall. The morning sun blazes through the windows. We sit on armchairs on either side of a coffee table.

He begins by telling me his story. “According to the research my family has made, we were one of the first families on St. Barth’s, in 1652.” Bruno was born on the island 300 years later, in 1951. His father worked odd jobs, building roads and even cutting the stone to be used in building a vacation home for David Rockefeller, who bought land on the west side of the island in the mid- to late 50s. It was Rockefeller who introduced St. Barth’s to the outside world when, in the early 60s, he entertained such luminaries there as Henry Kissinger and Aristotle Onassis.

Until then the vast majority of the local men were working on nearby Guadeloupe and would travel back and forth by sailboat. The few families able to afford to educate their children sent them to school on Guadeloupe or Martinique. Magras was not one of them. “I didn’t go to school,” he tells me, “but I read a lot, and I studied by myself a lot to know what I know today. I don’t have any regrets about that, because I know people who went to school for 20 years and I wouldn’t cut off my head to put on theirs.”

When he was 16, Magras moved to St. Thomas, in the American Virgin Islands, where he worked as a gas-station attendant and a mechanic’s assistant before learning how to fly in hopes of becoming a pilot. He then worked as a manager at the Guadeloupe airport for 15 years.

Magras had political aspirations early on. In 1976, at the age of 24, he was elected to his first office and by 1983 had risen to become deputy mayor. He temporarily abandoned politics in 1989 to concentrate on his business interests, including the island’s only cement company, a lucrative enterprise he owned with his brother Michel. (Bruno sold his stake in the company in 2003.) In 1995 he started St. Barth Commuter and was elected mayor.

When I ask him about Balazs’s Saline development he downplays what many on the island characterize as his enthusiasm for the project and the fact that he has not accepted the environmentalists’ petition, which would force the council to hold a vote on the project. “Now we have a few people here that, without knowing what was going on, made a petition,” he says. “Thirteen hundred people signed a piece of paper, without knowing anything, accusing the president that he was for developing Saline and this and that. Well, that’s politics. But it’s not my move, it’s not my word in politics. When you come to talk to me, I must receive you and listen to you, see what you think. And whether I agree with you or not, or perhaps will agree with you under some condition, we talk about it. But that’s not the way that people react; everyone has their own interpretation of what is going on. And what is going on is that André Balazs made a request to open the area to build an eco-resort, and the council did not approve opening the area.”

But Magras also says that St. Barth’s is a “free country” and that he and the Territorial Council can do little to prevent anyone from buying land or building on it, especially if he goes to court, which he says is an option for Balazs. It doesn’t take much prodding to get Magras to admit he is not exactly an environmentalist. “Of course, some people would like everything to be green and to live with the little birds, the flowers,” he says. “Some of them should go into the middle of the Amazon—you know what I mean—and live with the birds. That’s the best way. Because now they can build houses in trees.”

David Zara is convinced Magras, who is up for re-election in 2012, is just biding his time and planning for a way to push ahead with the Saline development. “Bruno’s like a scorpion,” Zara says. “He waits in the shade. He burrows himself in the sand, and then he comes back and bites. Now that he made one of the pieces of land nearby buildable, what is he going to do? He’s going to come back in a few months and say, ‘How can we deny permission to André Balazs?’ ” (“I do not pay attention to rumors,” Magras says. “Those unfounded comments are part of the ‘national sport’ of the island.”)

The petition against developing Saline was presented to the Territorial Council on October 6, 2009, but Magras didn’t put it on the agenda, as required by law, according to Maxime Desouches. The petition’s sponsors hired a lawyer and “eventually the administration judge will rule in favor of such inscription,” says Desouches, who believes the project is dead. “This will be a deal breaker between Bruno and the population,” he adds. “There’s no real need for the project, and people are more thinking now of a pause in the development of the island.”

But André Balazs says he will continue to pursue the eco-resort. “I’ve been coming to St. Barth’s most of my life, and I have always viewed the Saline project as a long-term commitment to the community,” he says. “All of our projects have been in historically sensitive areas in sophisticated communities, and addressing the concerns and interests of these communities is an integral part of these projects’ success.”

It took Balazs six years to build the Mercer; he’s only six months into Saline. Talk with him and you believe he will prevail. As Desouches says, “St. Barth’s is like a beautiful woman Men will do anything to have her.”
V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook

Lady Gaga Submits Resume to Philip Treacy, Prepares to Make Coffee

Just to show she is completely serious, pop icon Lady Gaga has just submitted her resume to London milliner Philip Treacy as part of her bid to intern for him this summer.

A spokesperson at Philip Treacy said the resume was serious but also “pretty funny” — and that though there are many requests from media outlets to see what’s on it, for now, Mr. Treacy, who makes Lady Gaga’s hats is staying mum. (Gaga’s real name is Stefani Joanne Angelina Germanotta and she is 24).

Getting an internship with Treacy, 43, is no easy feat. “You need to have experience, and be very, very quick,” explains a spokesperson.

Gaga’s experience is obviously not of the conventional kind — her college major at New York University’s Tisch School was in music, not fashion — but no matter. “She really wants to learn fashion” says Treacy’s PR agent.

Is the London milliner worried that the internship could damage their friendship? That there might be a “blow-up” between two highly creative people?

Pause.

“We’ll see.”

Gaga has agreed to take an intern’s wages — namely nothing for one month — and she is said to be “very very keen to learn the craft of making hats.”

“After all, Coco Chanel started out making hats,” the Philip Treacy spokesperson reminded me.

True.

But did Coco Chanel ever make the coffee? Apparently coffee-making is definitely on Gaga’s list of duties while under Treacy’s employment. V

Digg StumbleUpon Facebook